BananaIP Archives

Image accompanying blogpost on "Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench."

Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench.

Delhi High Court split on jurisdiction for trademark rectification petitions: firstly stated any High Court, later restricted it to granting IP Office’s jurisdiction. The underlying point is differentiating Trade Marks Act from Patents and Designs Acts and emphasizing convenience for businesses. Continue Reading Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench.

February 16, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 401Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Image accompanying blogpost on "R Indira Devi has no Copyrights over Guntur Sushendra Sharma's "My Country My People", says the Telangana High Court."

R Indira Devi has no Copyrights over Guntur Sushendra Sharma’s “My Country My People”, says the Telangana High Court.

In this case, the Telangana High Court found that a letter written by the author in 1989 granting his son the copyrights was valid and that the author’s wife’s later assignments of the copyrights were not valid. Continue Reading R Indira Devi has no Copyrights over Guntur Sushendra Sharma’s “My Country My People”, says the Telangana High Court.

February 15, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Copyrights, Intellectual Property 0Comment 373Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Refusal of a patent application based on prior art not cited in hearing notice set aside by the Delhi High Court

In this case the Delhi High Court set aside an order of the Controller of Patents refusing a patent application based on a ground not raised in the hearing notice. The refusal order was set aside as it lacked proper reasoning as required for inventive step analysis. Continue Reading Refusal of a patent application based on prior art not cited in hearing notice set aside by the Delhi High Court

February 14, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 436Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Inventive Step analysis requires a rigorous examination, not surface analysis, says the Delhi High Court.

In this case the Delhi High Court set aside an order of the Controller of Patents refusing a patent application. The refusal order was set aside as it lacked proper reasoning as required for inventive step analysis. Continue Reading Inventive Step analysis requires a rigorous examination, not surface analysis, says the Delhi High Court.

February 14, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 434Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Trademark opposition timelines are mandatory, and must be complied strictly, says the Delhi High Court

In this case, the Delhi High Court explored if a trademark opposition be ‘deemed as abandoned’ if there was a delay in service of evidence by the opponent in the opposition. The Court also explained whether the timelines mentioned in the Trade Marks Act and Rules are mandatory or not. Continue Reading Trademark opposition timelines are mandatory, and must be complied strictly, says the Delhi High Court

February 13, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 390Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Image accompanying blogpost on "Method of producing 'protein enriched blood serum' is not a method of treatment under Section 3(i), says the Delhi High Court"

Method of producing ‘protein enriched blood serum’ is not a method of treatment under Section 3(i), says the Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court reviewed whether new objections can be raised at the hearing stage of a Patent Application. The Court examined the claims and the refusal order, from the purview of Principles of Natural Justice. Continue Reading Method of producing ‘protein enriched blood serum’ is not a method of treatment under Section 3(i), says the Delhi High Court

February 13, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 357Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

‘Sri Sharanam Ayyappa’, ‘Dengue Don’ , and ‘Raashee’, Trademark Case Decisions

Recent trademark rulings by the Delhi and Bombay High Courts address infringement and damages in cases involving ‘Sri Sharanam Ayyappa’, ‘Dengue Don’, and ‘Raashee’ trademarks. Continue Reading ‘Sri Sharanam Ayyappa’, ‘Dengue Don’ , and ‘Raashee’, Trademark Case Decisions

February 13, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 199Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench

Delhi High Court refers the question of filing jurisdiction for trademark rectification petitions to a larger bench, seeking clarity on whether it’s limited to the trademark office’s jurisdiction or any High Court. Continue Reading Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench

February 12, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 282Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Product by Process Patent Claims are Product Claims, not Process Claims, rules the Delhi High Court

In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court clarifies the nature of product by process patent claims in the ferric carboxymaltose dispute between Vifor International and MSN Labs. Continue Reading Product by Process Patent Claims are Product Claims, not Process Claims, rules the Delhi High Court

February 8, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 377Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Use of Akshay Tanna’s persona and reputation on social media for investment scams taken down

The Delhi High Court has mandated the takedown of fraudulent social media activities exploiting Akshay Tanna’s reputation for investment scams Continue Reading Use of Akshay Tanna’s persona and reputation on social media for investment scams taken down

February 8, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Publicity Rights/ Celebrity Rights 0Comment 266Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench.

R Indira Devi has no Copyrights over Guntur Sushendra Sharma’s “My Country My People”, says the Telangana High Court.

Refusal of a patent application based on prior art not cited in hearing notice set aside by the Delhi High Court

Inventive Step analysis requires a rigorous examination, not surface analysis, says the Delhi High Court.

Trademark opposition timelines are mandatory, and must be complied strictly, says the Delhi High Court

Method of producing ‘protein enriched blood serum’ is not a method of treatment under Section 3(i), says the Delhi High Court

‘Sri Sharanam Ayyappa’, ‘Dengue Don’ , and ‘Raashee’, Trademark Case Decisions

Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench

Product by Process Patent Claims are Product Claims, not Process Claims, rules the Delhi High Court

Use of Akshay Tanna’s persona and reputation on social media for investment scams taken down

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us