Trademarks | Intellepedia

Disney finally dances to Deadmau5’s tune

Deadmau5 and Disney have settled their trademark dispute regarding the Mau5head symbol after extensive legal negotiations. The agreement allows Deadmau5 to continue using and registering his logo, reflecting broader themes in intellectual property law.

Cease and desist notice to Snapdeal

Nalli issued a cease and desist notice to Snapdeal for alleged unauthorised use of its trademark and images. The incident highlights ongoing legal debates concerning the liability of e-commerce platforms for the actions of their sellers in India.

Peps Industries Vs. Shakti Mattresses & Gears

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Peps Industries, restraining Shakti Mattresses from using the SPINE GUARD trademark. This case highlights trademark protection in India’s mattress industry.

This town isn’t enough for the two of us : Zara Trademark Dispute

This post discusses the Delhi High Court’s ruling in the Zara trademark dispute, focusing on trademark protection and the legal reasoning behind the decision. The analysis highlights the court’s approach to brand rights and infringement in India.

Is There a Trademark in a Name?

This post explores whether a name can serve as a trademark in India, focusing on legal battles involving educational institutions. Analysing the VIT case, it discusses trademark infringement, passing off, and the significance of well known marks in Indian law.

Trademark Case Review: PEPS Industries v. Coir Foam

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Peps Industries, restraining Coirfoam India from using marks similar to ‘Spring Guard’. The case underscores critical principles of trademark protection and interim relief in Indian law.

The Chocolate Wars – Wrangle between Nestle & Cadbury on KitKat Shape TM

The legal tussle between Nestle and Cadbury over the KitKat shape trademark underscores the significance of product identity in the chocolate industry. This post explores the history, court decisions, and strategic considerations in their trademark disputes, providing an objective legal analysis.

Phonetic Justice for Trademark

The article discusses the legal importance of phonetic similarity in trademark disputes, focusing on decisions from both the European Union and Indian courts. It examines statutory provisions and recent case law to illustrate how phonetic resemblance can result in trademark registration being denied to prevent consumer confusion.

Case Review: Hypnos Ltd. v. PEPS Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors

The IPAB’s decision in Hypnos Ltd. v. PEPS Industries addresses the requirements for proving trans-border reputation and well-known status in Indian trademark disputes. The Board’s approach highlights the importance of local use and robust evidence in rectification proceedings.

PEPS victorious in Trademark Battle against UK bed manufacturer

Peps successfully defended its ‘HYPNOS’ trademark against a UK manufacturer’s rectification suit, with the Appellate Board recognising its established Indian reputation. This case highlights the significance of diligent IP management for Indian companies.