In the case of Triumph Designs Limited v. Tube Investments of India and Anr., the Calcutta High Court addressed two critical issues: whether the petitioner was a person aggrieved under Section 47 of the Trademarks Act, and whether the TRIUMPH mark had been unused for a statutory period justifying its cancellation.
Read more about Court cancels 75-Year-Old TRIUMPH Trademark for Non-Use in Favor of Triumph MotorcyclesAuthor: Gaurav Mishra
Court Remands Patent Rejection Over IV Catheter, Cites Flawed Obviousness Test
Delhi HC sets aside patent rejection for IV catheter, citing flawed inventive step analysis under Agriboard test and lack of reasoned decision.
Read more about Court Remands Patent Rejection Over IV Catheter, Cites Flawed Obviousness TestDelhi High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in LAHORI ZEERA Trademark Infringement Case
Delhi HC restrains Balaji Foods from using the LAHOR ZEERA mark, upholding Archian Foods’ IP rights over LAHORI ZEERA’s trademark, label, and design.
Read more about Delhi High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in LAHORI ZEERA Trademark Infringement CaseCannot raise new ground while refusing patent, rules Delhi High Court
Delhi HC set aside a patent refusal against Proprietect L P, citing violation of natural justice, failure to consider amended claims, and lack of reasoning.
Read more about Cannot raise new ground while refusing patent, rules Delhi High CourtSweet victory and Sweeter rewards – court declares NUTELLA well-known Trademark
Delhi HC grants Ferrero ₹30 lakh in damages, declaring ‘NUTELLA’ a well-known trademark in a major counterfeit case against M.B. Enterprises.
Read more about Sweet victory and Sweeter rewards – court declares NUTELLA well-known TrademarkCourt delivers an ‘Iconic’ ruling in JOLLY RANCHER trademark dispute
Gujarat High Court quashes Shiv Textiles’ trademark suit against Iconic IP Interests LLC for lack of Indian jurisdiction and no valid cause of action under CPC.
Read more about Court delivers an ‘Iconic’ ruling in JOLLY RANCHER trademark disputeAtomberg fans or Luker fans, whose “fan” are you?
The Bombay High Court dismissed Atomberg’s appeal against the denial of an interim injunction in a design infringement case against Luker. The court ruled that Atomberg’s fan design lacked novelty due to prior publication and was merely a trade variant.
Read more about Atomberg fans or Luker fans, whose “fan” are you?Court Awards ₹50 Lakh to GSP Crop Science in Patent Infringement Case Over Agrochemical Formula
Delhi HC orders ₹50 lakh in damages to GSP Crop Science for patent infringement in agrochemicals, affirming seller liability under Indian patent law.
Read more about Court Awards ₹50 Lakh to GSP Crop Science in Patent Infringement Case Over Agrochemical FormulaPatented Biologics and Section 104A: No Process Disclosure Without Proving Product Identity
Roche sued Zydus for infringing its process patent on Pertuzumab. The Delhi High Court held that Roche had not shown Zydus’s biosimilar was identical to its product. Without identity, Section 104A did not apply, and the Court refused to compel Zydus to disclose its manufacturing process.
Read more about Patented Biologics and Section 104A: No Process Disclosure Without Proving Product IdentityDolby v. Lava: INR 20 Crore Deposit Ordered in SEP patent infringement case
Delhi HC directs Lava to deposit ₹20 crore as pro tem security in Dolby’s SEP infringement suit involving AAC audio tech patents.
Read more about Dolby v. Lava: INR 20 Crore Deposit Ordered in SEP patent infringement case