e-Commerce Law | Intellepedia

IndiaMart, PUMA, Drop-Downs, and Intermediary Liability

A man carrying a box walks on a running track that leads into a web browser window, symbolizing entry into an online marketplace.

In a trademark infringement dispute between IndiaMART Intermesh Ltd. (“IndiaMART”) and PUMA SE (“PUMA”), the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court set aside a prior injunction restraining IndiaMART from offering the PUMA trademark as an option in its seller registration drop-down menu. The Court permitted IndiaMART to continue offering trademark-based menu items and search terms, subject to obligations regarding takedown of infringing listings.

Supreme Court Upholds Free Speech in Wikimedia Case, Sets Aside Takedown Order

In a clear endorsement of constitutional protections in the digital realm, the Supreme Court set aside a Delhi High Court directive requiring removal of Wikipedia content related to a defamation suit. The Court held that such pre-emptive takedown orders, absent a compelling constitutional basis, violate the freedoms guaranteed under Articles 19 and 21, and cannot be sustained within India’s legal framework.

Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement

The Delhi High Court has ordered Amazon Technologies, Inc. to pay ₹336 crore in damages for willful trademark infringement of the Beverly Hills Polo Club logo. The ruling also includes ₹3.23 crore in litigation costs and a permanent injunction against Amazon. The case, filed by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and Lifestyle Licensing B.V., highlights Amazon’s liability in unauthorized brand usage.

Court orders Meesho to display Seller Information and comply with Ecommerce Rules

The Delhi High Court has ordered Meesho to display full seller information and comply with ecommerce regulations following a copyright dispute. This decision highlights the responsibility of e-commerce platforms to protect intellectual property and ensure transparency for consumers.

Indiamart cannot claim Intermediary Status, says Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has denied Indiamart intermediary status for failing to prevent trademark infringement of Puma on its platform. The ruling highlights the need for active due diligence by ecommerce intermediaries to avoid direct liability for IP violations.

Monthly Roundup: Key IP Cases reported in March 2023

This roundup discusses notable Indian IP cases from March 2023, covering trademark, patent, copyright, consumer, and accessibility law. The post provides objective analysis and key judicial findings on recent legal decisions relevant to IP stakeholders.

Weekly News Updates: E-Commerce

This bulletin presents a structured overview of current e-commerce legal and business developments, including CAIT’s anti-monopoly initiatives, Walmart’s service expansion, and Amazon’s stance on new US legislation. The analysis is compiled by the BananaIP Counsels legal team.

Weekly Updates: E-Commerce and IP Licensing News

This week’s bulletin examines the latest movements in India’s e-commerce and IP licensing sectors. Key topics include Google’s e-commerce relaunch, Swiggy’s new Minis service, anti-fake review initiatives, and major licensing agreements.

Weekly Updates: E-Commerce and Licensing News

This bulletin analyses recent developments in e-commerce and licensing, including Amazon’s new Smart Commerce initiative, Google’s interest in the ONDC platform, and Marvel’s licensing deal with Stan Lee Universe. It also discusses EA Sports’ decision to discontinue the FIFA video game franchise.

Recap 2021: IP Updates – Part 3

This post reviews the 2021 proposed amendments to the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, focusing on new compliance requirements and obligations for e-commerce entities in India. It offers structured legal analysis and practical suggestions on the regulatory changes.