The Delhi High Court has ordered Amazon Technologies, Inc. to pay ₹336 crore in damages for willful trademark infringement of the Beverly Hills Polo Club logo. The ruling also includes ₹3.23 crore in litigation costs and a permanent injunction against Amazon. The case, filed by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and Lifestyle Licensing B.V., highlights Amazon’s liability in unauthorized brand usage.
Read more about Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark InfringementTag: Brand Protection
A battle for respect : Svamaan Financial Takes on Sammaan Capital in Trademark case
In a significant trademark dispute, the Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Svamaan Financial Services, granting an interim injunction against Sammaan Capital Limited and its affiliates. The Court found that the defendants’ marks were deceptively similar to Svamaan, potentially misleading consumers. The ruling reinforces the importance of brand identity and legal recourse in financial services.
Read more about A battle for respect : Svamaan Financial Takes on Sammaan Capital in Trademark caseCOCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors
The Delhi High Court cancelled a deceptively similar trademark registration for COCOMELON, reinforcing protections for well-known marks. The judgment highlights that substantial similarity and bad faith can lead to trademark cancellation in India.
Read more about COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat CompetitorsCourt Checks Out: ‘GINGER’ Hotel’s Fraudsters Blocked
The Delhi High Court has blocked fraudulent websites infringing on the Ginger Hotel brand and ordered banks to freeze associated accounts. This protects IHCL’s trademark rights and safeguards consumer interests pending further hearings.
Read more about Court Checks Out: ‘GINGER’ Hotel’s Fraudsters BlockedSnack Wars: Haldiram’s Battle for Brand Supremacy
This post explores Haldiram’s successful legal action against trademark infringement, resulting in permanent injunctions and damages. It discusses the judicial recognition of Haldiram as a well-known mark, reflecting broader implications for brand protection in India.
Read more about Snack Wars: Haldiram’s Battle for Brand SupremacyTrademark Value: NYKAA, A to Z, Social, and Burger King Trademark Injunctions
This post reviews four Delhi High Court trademark injunction cases involving Nykaa, Social, A to Z, and Burger King. It highlights legal strategies and court reasoning in protecting brand value and enforcing trademark rights in India.
Read more about Trademark Value: NYKAA, A to Z, Social, and Burger King Trademark InjunctionsSubway Loses Battle for Interim Injunction against Suberb
The Delhi High Court dismissed Subway’s interim injunction application against Suberb after the defendants changed their branding and sandwich names. The court found no infringement or passing off, noting Subway’s inability to monopolise the term “sub” in relation to sandwiches.
Read more about Subway Loses Battle for Interim Injunction against Suberb5 Reasons to Protect Your Trademark
Protecting your trademark through registration offers significant legal and commercial advantages. It helps prevent misuse, enables enforcement, and supports business growth. Trademark registration is essential for safeguarding your brand and maximising your company’s value.
Read more about 5 Reasons to Protect Your TrademarkHow many of these brands do you know?
This post explores the recognition of well known trademarks in India, detailing the legal framework, criteria, and recent brands added to the official list. It also discusses the advantages and implications of this status for brand owners.
Read more about How many of these brands do you know?RECAP 2021- INDIAN TRADEMARK CASE LAWS
A detailed recap of Indian trademark case laws from 2021, covering key High Court decisions on infringement, well-known marks, and interim relief. This summary provides legal insights into recent trends and judicial reasoning in Indian trademark disputes.
Read more about RECAP 2021- INDIAN TRADEMARK CASE LAWS