Sweet victory and Sweeter rewards – court declares NUTELLA well-known Trademark

A joyful young man holding a jar of Nutella with a spoon in mid-air, surrounded by swirling ribbons of chocolate in a dreamy, artistic background. Featured image for article: Sweet victory and Sweeter rewards – court declares NUTELLA well-known Trademark

Delhi HC grants Ferrero ₹30 lakh in damages, declaring ‘NUTELLA’ a well-known trademark in a major counterfeit case against M.B. Enterprises.

Read more about Sweet victory and Sweeter rewards – court declares NUTELLA well-known Trademark

ORSL vs ERSI: Delhi Court’s Juicy ruling in Johnson & Johnson ORSL Trademark Infringement Case

Cartoon depiction of a boxing match between two juice box characters representing "ORSL" (blue) and "ERSI" (orange), symbolizing a trademark dispute. Both cartons wear boxing gloves and shoes, standing in a ring with splashes of juice and torn labels around, reflecting a legal battle over brand similarity. Featured image for article: ORSL vs ERSI: Delhi Court’s Juicy ruling in Johnson & Johnson ORSL Trademark Infringement Case

Delhi HC awards Rs. 1.21 cr to J&J in the ORSL trademark case against ERSI & ElectroORS for deceptive similarity and injunction violations.

Read more about ORSL vs ERSI: Delhi Court’s Juicy ruling in Johnson & Johnson ORSL Trademark Infringement Case

Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement

Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement Featured image for article: Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement

The Delhi High Court has ordered Amazon Technologies, Inc. to pay ₹336 crore in damages for willful trademark infringement of the Beverly Hills Polo Club logo. The ruling also includes ₹3.23 crore in litigation costs and a permanent injunction against Amazon. The case, filed by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and Lifestyle Licensing B.V., highlights Amazon’s liability in unauthorized brand usage.

Read more about Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement

A battle for respect : Svamaan Financial Takes on Sammaan Capital in Trademark case

A battle for respect : Svamaan Financial Takes on Sammaan Capital in Trademark case Featured image for article: A battle for respect : Svamaan Financial Takes on Sammaan Capital in Trademark case

In a significant trademark dispute, the Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Svamaan Financial Services, granting an interim injunction against Sammaan Capital Limited and its affiliates. The Court found that the defendants’ marks were deceptively similar to Svamaan, potentially misleading consumers. The ruling reinforces the importance of brand identity and legal recourse in financial services.

Read more about A battle for respect : Svamaan Financial Takes on Sammaan Capital in Trademark case

Trademark Value: NYKAA, A to Z, Social, and Burger King Trademark Injunctions

This post reviews four Delhi High Court trademark injunction cases involving Nykaa, Social, A to Z, and Burger King. It highlights legal strategies and court reasoning in protecting brand value and enforcing trademark rights in India.

Read more about Trademark Value: NYKAA, A to Z, Social, and Burger King Trademark Injunctions

Subway Loses Battle for Interim Injunction against Suberb

The Delhi High Court dismissed Subway’s interim injunction application against Suberb after the defendants changed their branding and sandwich names. The court found no infringement or passing off, noting Subway’s inability to monopolise the term “sub” in relation to sandwiches.

Read more about Subway Loses Battle for Interim Injunction against Suberb