Delhi High Court asks the Patent Office to decide on amendments and give adequate opportunity in Opposition Proceedings

The Delhi High Court has provided clear procedural guidance for patent opposition proceedings, focusing on transparency and fair opportunity for all parties. The judgment underscores the importance of timely decisions on claim amendments and systematic handling of pre-grant oppositions by the Indian Patent Office.

Read more about Delhi High Court asks the Patent Office to decide on amendments and give adequate opportunity in Opposition Proceedings

Post-Grant Patent Opposition, Evidence and Hearings: Role of Patent Office, Opposition Board, and Parties

This post provides an analytical overview of the procedures and legal standards for post-grant patent opposition in India. It examines the Delhi High Court’s guidance on evidence, hearings, and the respective roles of the Patent Office and Opposition Board, underscoring the need for transparency and timely adjudication.

Read more about Post-Grant Patent Opposition, Evidence and Hearings: Role of Patent Office, Opposition Board, and Parties

High Court permits delayed trademark evidence because of E-portal upload issues

The Delhi High Court permitted delayed filing of trademark opposition evidence due to e-portal upload limits, clarifying statutory timelines under trademark rules. This case illustrates how technical challenges in e-filing are addressed by the judiciary to ensure procedural fairness in trademark proceedings.

Read more about High Court permits delayed trademark evidence because of E-portal upload issues

CASE BRIEF : European Commission vs. Union of India

This case brief discusses the Delhi High Court’s decision in European Commission vs Union of India regarding the restoration of patent applications deemed abandoned due to procedural lapses. The judgment underscores the importance of judicial discretion in exceptional circumstances under Indian patent law.

Read more about CASE BRIEF : European Commission vs. Union of India

High Court remands Patent Office’s Legally Infirm and Unreasoned Order

The Delhi High Court remanded a Patent Office order in a patent grant case for being legally infirm and unreasoned. The judgment underscores the importance of detailed reasoning and adherence to the principles of natural justice in patent proceedings.

Read more about High Court remands Patent Office’s Legally Infirm and Unreasoned Order

Weekly Updates: Copyright and Entertainment Law

This weekly bulletin summarises key copyright infringement cases in the entertainment industry, including disputes involving NBA players, filmmakers, and streaming platforms. It highlights recent legal actions and court decisions in both India and the US, offering structured insights into current trends in copyright and entertainment law.

Read more about Weekly Updates: Copyright and Entertainment Law

BananaIP’s Comments and Suggestions – Proposed Draft of Amendments to IT Rules, 2021

This post analyses BananaIP Counsels’ comments on the proposed amendments to the IT Rules, 2021. It provides structured recommendations for improving intermediary accountability, grievance mechanisms, and transparency in the implementation of the Rules.

Read more about BananaIP’s Comments and Suggestions – Proposed Draft of Amendments to IT Rules, 2021