Use of mark “NOVYA” for selling ‘Ghee’ amounts to passing off and infringement of the mark “NOVA”

The Delhi High Court ruled that selling ghee under the mark NOVYA constitutes passing off and infringement of the registered NOVA trademark. The Court’s decision imposed a permanent injunction and penalty on the Defendant for contempt, highlighting the importance of trademark protection in the dairy sector.

Read more about Use of mark “NOVYA” for selling ‘Ghee’ amounts to passing off and infringement of the mark “NOVA”

Chand-z Vs. Chand-A For Lungis: Chand-A trademark is not infringing as the use is honest and concurrent, says the Madras High Court.

The Madras High Court ruled that the Chand-A trademark for lungis is not infringing due to honest and concurrent use. The decision clarifies key principles for establishing such use in trademark disputes.

Read more about Chand-z Vs. Chand-A For Lungis: Chand-A trademark is not infringing as the use is honest and concurrent, says the Madras High Court.

Use of the Trademark ‘Candlelight’ for Musical Concerts restrained by the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction against the use of the ‘Candlelight’ trademark for concerts, siding with Fever Labs in a passing off dispute. The ruling highlights the protection of unregistered but distinctive trademarks in India’s live entertainment sector.

Read more about Use of the Trademark ‘Candlelight’ for Musical Concerts restrained by the Delhi High Court

Premier Vs. Barclays Premier League, Apollo Mark Well-Known Status?, and Roobini Vs. Rubam Trademark Cases

This post examines recent trademark cases from Indian courts, discussing composite mark analysis, well-known mark recognition, and the standard for confusion. Key judgments on Barclays Premier League, Apollo, and Roobini vs. Rubam offer practical guidance for trademark strategy and compliance.

Read more about Premier Vs. Barclays Premier League, Apollo Mark Well-Known Status?, and Roobini Vs. Rubam Trademark Cases

Delhi High Court Fines Defendant 2 Lakhs for Infringing Use of “Sadda Pind”

The Delhi High Court has fined a Rajasthan restaurant 2 lakhs for infringing the “Sadda Pind” trademarks of a Punjab-based Cultural Living Museum. The court’s decision highlights the importance of enforcing intellectual property rights and sets a precedent for punitive action against trademark infringement in India.

Read more about Delhi High Court Fines Defendant 2 Lakhs for Infringing Use of “Sadda Pind”

TTK Prestige Prevails in Its Quest For the Use Of “Prestige”

TTK Prestige succeeded in a trademark infringement case before the Delhi High Court, securing a permanent injunction against unauthorized use of the “Prestige” mark. The judgment highlights the necessity of continuous use and evidence in trademark disputes in India.

Read more about TTK Prestige Prevails in Its Quest For the Use Of “Prestige”

Subway Loses Battle for Interim Injunction against Suberb

The Delhi High Court dismissed Subway’s interim injunction application against Suberb after the defendants changed their branding and sandwich names. The court found no infringement or passing off, noting Subway’s inability to monopolise the term “sub” in relation to sandwiches.

Read more about Subway Loses Battle for Interim Injunction against Suberb

CASE BRIEF : Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Amazonbuys.in & Ors.

The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte ad interim injunction to Amazon Seller Services, recognising trademark and copyright infringement by the defendants. This decision highlights judicial vigilance in protecting well-known marks and original works in online marketplaces.

Read more about CASE BRIEF : Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Amazonbuys.in & Ors.