The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favour of Himalaya, finding AB Allcare’s use of Liv-40 and similar trade dress to be deceptively similar to Liv.52. This case highlights critical aspects of trademark and trade dress protection in India.
Read more about “Liv-52 versus Liv-40.” In the game of Trademarks you “Liv” or you die!Tag: Passing off
Court Bans infringers from infringing “RAY-BAN”
The Delhi Court restrained Iswar Opticals and others from using marks deceptively similar to Ray-Ban, upholding Luxottica’s trademark rights. The judgment underscores the legal framework protecting famous marks against counterfeiting and passing off in India.
Read more about Court Bans infringers from infringing “RAY-BAN”Fake Headsets? Not on Samsung’s Watch: Court Issues Permanent Injunction
The Delhi District Court granted a permanent injunction to Samsung against sellers of counterfeit headsets for trademark infringement and passing off. The judgment underscores the legal remedies available for brand protection in India.
Read more about Fake Headsets? Not on Samsung’s Watch: Court Issues Permanent InjunctionDelhi High Court issues injunctions for fraudulently using IP Law Firm’s Trademark and Partner’s Name
The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction against unidentified defendants for fraudulently using an IP law firm’s trademark and partner’s name. The court’s order addresses trademark infringement, passing off, and cybercrime, while emphasizing the need for vigilance against such deceptive practices.
Read more about Delhi High Court issues injunctions for fraudulently using IP Law Firm’s Trademark and Partner’s NameHimalayan Organics Crumbles Before the Trademark Mountain of Himalaya
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Himalaya in its trademark dispute with Vlado Sky over the “HIMALAYAN ORGANICS” mark. The order cited probable consumer confusion and risk of dilution of Himalaya’s established brand.
Read more about Himalayan Organics Crumbles Before the Trademark Mountain of HimalayaThou shall not ‘STEEL’ a trademark, says court
The Madras High Court has ruled in favour of Prakash Ferrous Industries, granting them an injunction over the TIRUMALA trademark for TMT steel bars. The judgment reinforces the importance of prior use and documentary proof in Indian trademark law.
Read more about Thou shall not ‘STEEL’ a trademark, says courtRebanta Healthcare gets hurt in fight over the mark “REBAHEAL”
The Delhi High Court has issued an interim order restraining Rebanta Healthcare from using the REBAHEAL mark following a trademark infringement suit by Dr. Reddy’s. The court found the marks identical, raising concerns of public confusion and health risks.
Read more about Rebanta Healthcare gets hurt in fight over the mark “REBAHEAL”Evaluating Trademark Infringement: Holistic View and Goods Differentiation to Determine Likelihood of Confusion
The Gujarat High Court clarified that trademark infringement requires a holistic comparison of marks and their respective goods or services. The court found no likelihood of confusion between Unisn and Unison, highlighting the need to consider all circumstances and the anti-dissection rule in such cases.
Read more about Evaluating Trademark Infringement: Holistic View and Goods Differentiation to Determine Likelihood of ConfusionNovartis says No to Novarish
The Bombay High Court granted Novartis an injunction against Novarish Healthcare for trademark infringement and passing off. The court found the marks deceptively similar and protected Novartis’s established rights under Indian IP law.
Read more about Novartis says No to NovarishDid Emerge Classes’ mark fail the ‘passing off’ test?
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court upheld an injunction against Emerge Classes in a trademark passing off dispute, emphasising goodwill and deceptive similarity. The Court found that overall similarity between the marks was likely to cause confusion among students.
Read more about Did Emerge Classes’ mark fail the ‘passing off’ test?