This article provides a detailed analysis of the novelty and inventive step of Ericsson’s AMR patents as examined in Ericsson Vs. Lava. The Delhi High Court’s findings illustrate how Indian patent law standards are applied to complex telecommunication inventions.
Read more about Novelty and Inventive Step analysis (Part A) – Ericsson Vs. Lava – Part VIIITag: Ericsson vs. Lava
Revocation of Patent on the ground of misrepresentation – Ericsson vs Lava : Part VI
The Delhi High Court in Ericsson vs Lava clarified that revocation of a patent on the ground of misrepresentation requires strong, clear evidence of intentional deceit. In this case, Lava failed to meet the legal threshold, resulting in rejection of its revocation claim.
Read more about Revocation of Patent on the ground of misrepresentation – Ericsson vs Lava : Part VISection 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2
This post analyses the Delhi High Court’s interpretation of Section 3(k) in Ericsson vs Lava, focusing on the patentability of algorithms and computer programs in India. It clarifies the assessment criteria for such inventions and the legislative intent behind software patentability.
Read more about Section 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2