The Delhi High Court issued a significant interim injunction in the ITW pre-conditioned air patent dispute, focusing on inventive step and claim construction under Indian law. While ITW secured a ban on future infringing acts, Dabico’s existing airport deployments were allowed to proceed.
Read more about Cool interim order for ITW’s pre-conditioned air patent, but Competitor’s airport deals allowed to continueCourt Checks Out: ‘GINGER’ Hotel’s Fraudsters Blocked
The Delhi High Court has blocked fraudulent websites infringing on the Ginger Hotel brand and ordered banks to freeze associated accounts. This protects IHCL’s trademark rights and safeguards consumer interests pending further hearings.
Read more about Court Checks Out: ‘GINGER’ Hotel’s Fraudsters BlockedCow dung lamp from Traditional Knowledge fails to light up patentability standards
The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal seeking patent protection for a cow dung lamp, finding it ineligible due to reliance on traditional knowledge and lack of inventive step. The judgment offers clarity on the application of Section 3(p) and inventive step analysis under Indian patent law.
Read more about Cow dung lamp from Traditional Knowledge fails to light up patentability standardsHeifer’s Bullish Trademark Strategy Prevails: Court Grants Permanent Injunction
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction to Heifer Project International over unauthorized use of its trademarks by Heifer Project India Trust. The Court’s decision highlights the significance of valid trademark registration and enforcement in India’s non-profit sector.
Read more about Heifer’s Bullish Trademark Strategy Prevails: Court Grants Permanent InjunctionCourt balances Hygieia’s patent application after IPO disbalances it under section 59
The Madras High Court set aside the refusal of Hygieia’s patent application, stressing the importance of considering amended claims with the original specification. The case provides key guidance on section 59 and claim amendments under Indian patent law.
Read more about Court balances Hygieia’s patent application after IPO disbalances it under section 59“Focus on technology, not semantics” says court in case involving gene technology
The Madras High Court set aside a patent refusal for a gene technology application, criticising the Controller’s excessive focus on semantics over scientific content. The judgment directs the patent office to reconsider the application with an emphasis on technological merit.
Read more about “Focus on technology, not semantics” says court in case involving gene technologyIndian Patent and Design Statistics 2024 (June 28th to July 5th)
This report provides an analytical summary of Indian patent and design statistics for the week ending July 5th, 2024. It includes comprehensive data on publications, grants, examinations, and design registrations, with city-wise breakdowns and yearly overviews.
Read more about Indian Patent and Design Statistics 2024 (June 28th to July 5th)Court Cranks the Clock Back on Opposed Crankshaft Patent Refusal
The Madras High Court set aside the refusal of an opposed piston engine patent, citing insufficient analysis of inventive features. The case underscores the need for detailed examination of claim amendments and inventive step in Indian patent proceedings.
Read more about Court Cranks the Clock Back on Opposed Crankshaft Patent RefusalPatent on Portable Vehicle Management System goes offtrack
The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal of a patent application for a portable vehicle management system, citing lack of inventive step over prior art. This case highlights the application of key Indian patent law principles on non-obviousness and inventive step, particularly regarding mosaicing and hindsight bias.
Read more about Patent on Portable Vehicle Management System goes offtrackWhose mark got the ‘X’ Factor? Relaxo Footwear vs XS Brands
The Delhi High Court dismissed Relaxo Footwear’s claim over the ‘X’ device mark against XS Brands, highlighting the significance of coexistence and lack of confusion in trademark disputes. The post discusses the Court’s structured analysis of both parties’ arguments and the broader implications for mark distinctiveness.
Read more about Whose mark got the ‘X’ Factor? Relaxo Footwear vs XS Brands