trademark law | Intellepedia

Sipping on IP – Conversation on Intellectual Property

Sipping on IP is an initiative by BananaIP that encourages open conversations on intellectual property. Participants discuss a variety of topics, promoting learning and peer engagement in an informal setting.

‘Choo’ Only What You Can

This post discusses the Jimmy Choo cybersquatting case and its implications for trademark and domain name disputes. It provides an objective analysis of the legal proceedings and the protection of brand rights under international mechanisms.

From OHIM to EUIPO – OHIM’s New Trademark Reform

OHIM has transitioned to EUIPO, introducing key reforms in trademark registration and protection within the EU. The changes include a new fee structure, updated classification rules, and expanded powers for trademark proprietors, reflecting a move towards greater legal harmonization.

The First Amendment strikes again

The Slants trademark dispute addresses whether the Lanham Act’s disparagement clause violates the First Amendment. The case ultimately led to a significant decision on the constitutionality of denying trademark registration for allegedly offensive marks.

World’s Best IP Blogs – IP Tango

IP Tango is a leading blog covering intellectual property law and news from Latin America and beyond. Founded by Jeremy Philips and managed by Dr. Patricia Covarrubia, it offers reliable, expert analysis of key IP issues.

Can Supreme Court be the pain reliever?

The ongoing dispute between Moov and Zandu Balm raises critical questions about trademark disparagement and comparative advertising law in India. The Supreme Court appeal is set to clarify legal standards for such contentious advertisements.

World’s Best IP Blogs – Likelihood of Confusion

Likelihood of Confusion stands out as a leading IP blog, offering insightful analysis on trademark and copyright law. Authored by Ron Coleman, the blog’s unique perspectives make it a valuable resource for legal professionals and academics alike.

Don’t take the God’s name in vain

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that religious names like Ramayan cannot be trademarked for commercial products, citing public interest and the Trade Marks Act. This post examines the legal reasoning behind the decision and its implications for trademark law in India.

Pidilite Industries vs. Vilas Nemichand Jain.

The Bombay High Court examined the requirements for passing off a descriptive trademark in Pidilite Industries vs Vilas Nemichand Jain. The Court held that plaintiffs must prove both prior use and secondary meaning, dismissing the claim for lack of sufficient evidence.

Even death won’t do us apart

This article explores the legal controversies over Marilyn Monroe’s publicity rights and trademarks, focusing on estate litigation and merchandising disputes. It provides a clear analysis of the key court decisions and the ongoing struggle to balance estate control with public domain interests.