This post examines two landmark Indian cases where courts declined temporary injunctions in patent infringement suits. The judgments clarify the principles guiding interim relief, including the need for a prima facie case and a favourable balance of convenience.
Read more about Temporary Injunction CasesTag: temporary injunction
Temporary Injunction – F. Hoffmann-LA Roche Vs. Cipla
The Court refused a temporary injunction in the Roche vs Cipla patent dispute, highlighting non-disclosure, validity challenges, and public interest considerations. This analysis discusses the legal principles applied and the balance between patent rights and access to essential medicines.
Read more about Temporary Injunction – F. Hoffmann-LA Roche Vs. CiplaTemporary Injunction: J. Mitra Vs. Kesar Medicaments
In J. Mitra Vs. Kesar Medicaments, the Court examined criteria for granting a temporary injunction in a patent infringement suit. The analysis considered patent validity, infringement, and the balance of convenience, ultimately favouring interim relief for the patent holder.
Read more about Temporary Injunction: J. Mitra Vs. Kesar MedicamentsTemporary Injunction: Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works
This post discusses the denial of a temporary injunction in Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, focusing on patent validity and the criteria for interim relief in Indian patent law. The Court’s analysis highlights the importance of a prima facie case and the impact of recent patents facing validity challenges.
Read more about Temporary Injunction: Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works