Biodiversity law requirement of NBA Approval for Indian herbal companies

This article reviews the necessity of NBA approval for Indian herbal companies under the Biodiversity Act, especially after the Divya Pharmacy judgement. It outlines the legal framework governing access, benefit sharing, and patent applications involving biological resources.

Read more about Biodiversity law requirement of NBA Approval for Indian herbal companies

Draft Patent Rules 2019, India joins key WIPO treaties, Royal Enfield v. Flash Electronics and more

The bulletin examines the Draft Patent Rules 2019, India’s new WIPO treaty accessions, and key patent statistics. It highlights recent legal disputes and IP policy updates, providing a structured analysis of current trends in Indian intellectual property law.

Read more about Draft Patent Rules 2019, India joins key WIPO treaties, Royal Enfield v. Flash Electronics and more

Patentability of Genetically Modified Plant Breeds: The Monsanto Conclusion

The Supreme Court of India’s Monsanto judgment addresses the complex issue of patentability for genetically modified plant breeds. By remanding the case for evidence-based adjudication, the Court reinforces procedural rigour in intellectual property disputes involving agricultural biotechnology.

Read more about Patentability of Genetically Modified Plant Breeds: The Monsanto Conclusion

Indian Patent Statistics, Interesting inventions, Monsanto patent case, AMD versus Mediatek, USPTO news, International patent news and more

This report analyses recent trends in Indian patent statistics, important inventions, and major legal developments such as the Monsanto patent case and AMD versus Mediatek. It also updates on new government policies and significant international patent news, maintaining an objective and factual perspective.

Read more about Indian Patent Statistics, Interesting inventions, Monsanto patent case, AMD versus Mediatek, USPTO news, International patent news and more

A Conduit for INVALID PATENTS – Section 13(1)(b)

Section 13(1)(b) of the Indian Patent Act may inadvertently allow for the grant of invalid patents by restricting prior art consideration to only the claims of earlier Indian applications. A reconsideration of this provision is suggested to ensure more robust patent examination and to achieve the legislative intent of preventing invalid patents.

Read more about A Conduit for INVALID PATENTS – Section 13(1)(b)