When Dye Becomes Decisive: Patent Infringement, Equivalence, and Estoppel

A farmer on a tractor ploughing a sunlit field, with a backdrop of green hills and a molecular structure overlay, symbolising agricultural innovation and chemical formulation. Featured image for article: When Dye Becomes Decisive: Patent Infringement, Equivalence, and Estoppel

In a patent infringement case, the Delhi High Court denied Crystal Crop Protection’s request for an interim injunction against Safex Chemicals. The dispute in the case centred on a herbicidal formulation containing Clodinafop, Metribuzin, and a dyeing agent. The Court held that the dye was an essential claim element and that Safex’s dye-free products did not infringe, even by equivalence. It also invoked prosecution history estoppel, noting that Crystal’s own claim amendments precluded a broad claim interpretation.

Read more about When Dye Becomes Decisive: Patent Infringement, Equivalence, and Estoppel

Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement

Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement Featured image for article: Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement

The Delhi High Court has ordered Amazon Technologies, Inc. to pay ₹336 crore in damages for willful trademark infringement of the Beverly Hills Polo Club logo. The ruling also includes ₹3.23 crore in litigation costs and a permanent injunction against Amazon. The case, filed by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and Lifestyle Licensing B.V., highlights Amazon’s liability in unauthorized brand usage.

Read more about Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement

‘Big Dipper’ trademark infringement case, ruling on transborder reputation and importers’ rights

‘Big Dipper’ trademark infringement case, ruling on transborder reputation and importers' rights Featured image for article: ‘Big Dipper’ trademark infringement case, ruling on transborder reputation and importers’ rights

The Delhi High Court ruled on a trademark dispute between ‘Big Dipper’ and ‘Big Deeper,’ setting aside an ex parte injunction. The case centered on the assertion of transborder reputation by importers of the ‘Big Dipper’ mark. The Court relied on precedent to determine that mere global reputation is insufficient to claim trademark protection in India. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration.

Read more about ‘Big Dipper’ trademark infringement case, ruling on transborder reputation and importers’ rights

Delhi High Court Protects Hindware’s Trademark and Design Rights

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions in favor of Hindware Limited, restraining the Defendants from infringing Hindware’s trademarks and registered design. This landmark ruling underscores the importance of protecting trademark and design rights against counterfeit products.

Read more about Delhi High Court Protects Hindware’s Trademark and Design Rights

Indian Startup Secures Interim Injunction in PIP Patent Dispute with Canva

The Delhi High Court has granted an interim injunction in favor of RxPrism Health Systems, an Indian startup, against Canva, for prima facie infringement of a Picture-in-Picture (PIP) patent. The Court rejected Canva’s arguments of non-infringement and patent invalidity, mandating a deposit of Rs. 50 Lakh and costs of Rs. 5 Lakh.

Read more about Indian Startup Secures Interim Injunction in PIP Patent Dispute with Canva