Another Dis’connected’ order by the registry, set aside by the Court

The Calcutta High Court set aside a trademark refusal for Electronica India due to lack of reasoning and significant procedural lapses, instructing the registry to provide a fresh hearing. The order highlights the importance of fair hearing practices in Indian trademark law.

Read more about Another Dis’connected’ order by the registry, set aside by the Court

Emami vs Unilever : Court says No “Glow” to Unilever’s “Handsome”

The Calcutta High Court examined Emami’s claims against Unilever over the use of “Handsome” in skincare branding. While trademark infringement was not established, the Court found grounds for passing off and ordered Unilever to cease using the contested mark.

Read more about Emami vs Unilever : Court says No “Glow” to Unilever’s “Handsome”

Authors, Copyright and Royalty Share : The Calcutta High Court gives clarity

The Calcutta High Court has clarified the scope of authors’ royalty rights under Indian copyright law, affirming protections introduced by the 2012 amendment. The judgment ensures that authors of literary and musical works receive royalties, irrespective of copyright ownership transfers or the date of creation.

Read more about Authors, Copyright and Royalty Share : The Calcutta High Court gives clarity

The 20-Year Patent Term from the Date of Filing is Constitutionally Valid

The Calcutta High Court has upheld the constitutional validity of the 20-year patent term from the date of filing under Section 53 of the Patents Act. The judgment clarifies the legislative scheme and confirms there is no inconsistency or arbitrariness in the provision.

Read more about The 20-Year Patent Term from the Date of Filing is Constitutionally Valid

Interesting Trademark Cases involving ‘Biriyani King’, ‘MI Sumeet’, and ‘Toofan’ Marks

This post examines recent trademark cases from the Delhi, Calcutta, and Madras High Courts, focusing on injunctions and rectification. The analysis underlines the significance of registration and consistent trademark use for legal protection in India.

Read more about Interesting Trademark Cases involving ‘Biriyani King’, ‘MI Sumeet’, and ‘Toofan’ Marks

Our Comments on the Draft IPD Rules of Calcutta High Court

BananaIP Counsels shares detailed comments on the Draft IPD Rules of the Calcutta High Court, focusing on accessibility, service timelines, and translation issues. The suggestions aim to improve procedural fairness and inclusivity in intellectual property litigation before the court.

Read more about Our Comments on the Draft IPD Rules of Calcutta High Court

Latest Trademark Law Decisions in India: Key Rulings and Insights – 2023

This post analyses recent trademark law decisions in India, focusing on distinctiveness, registration, and infringement based on 2023 judicial rulings. The discussed cases offer valuable insights for legal professionals and intellectual property stakeholders.

Read more about Latest Trademark Law Decisions in India: Key Rulings and Insights – 2023

Deciphering India’s Design Law: A Series on Noteworthy Judgments (Part 1)

This post presents an analytical overview of three recent High Court judgments interpreting design law in India. It highlights the courts’ reasoning on infringement and the standards for design validity, providing clarity for intellectual property stakeholders.

Read more about Deciphering India’s Design Law: A Series on Noteworthy Judgments (Part 1)