Philips’ damages decree remains enforceable despite patent expiry, underscoring post-expiry enforcement rights under Indian IP law.
Read more about Patent Expired. Damages Pending. Game Still On for Philips.Author: Sowmya S Murthy
Inventive Step Misjudged? Delhi HC Revives Trident’s Patent Application
Delhi HC revives Trident’s patent application, citing flaws in the inventive step analysis of its air-rich yarn invention.
Read more about Inventive Step Misjudged? Delhi HC Revives Trident’s Patent ApplicationDelhi High Court Grants Patent Application Restoration After Agent’s Error
Delhi High Court restores Synertec’s patent application, ruling that agent error, not intent, caused the missed Form-18 deadline.
Read more about Delhi High Court Grants Patent Application Restoration After Agent’s ErrorMadras High Court Overturns Patent Refusal for Ab Initio’s Data Lineage Invention
Madras High Court patent judgment backs Ab Initio’s data lineage invention, affirming novelty and inventive step in software patents.
Read more about Madras High Court Overturns Patent Refusal for Ab Initio’s Data Lineage InventionFrimline v. K-SMATCO: Delhi HC Rules Firmly in Pharmaceutical Patent Infringement Case
In Frimline v. K-SMATCO, Delhi HC granted interim relief over patent IN 382949, citing strong prima facie infringement of Frimline’s pharmaceutical formulation.
Read more about Frimline v. K-SMATCO: Delhi HC Rules Firmly in Pharmaceutical Patent Infringement CaseSaint-Gobain Patent Rejection: Delhi HC Finds No Inventive Step in Glass Coating Claim
Delhi HC upholds Saint-Gobain patent rejection, ruling that the glass coating claim lacked inventive step and failed to show technical advancement.
Read more about Saint-Gobain Patent Rejection: Delhi HC Finds No Inventive Step in Glass Coating ClaimCRI Patentability Affirmed: Madras High Court Rules in Favor of Syngene
Madras HC upholds CRI patentability in Syngene’s case, ruling novel hardware isn’t a prerequisite for protection under Section 3(k).
Read more about CRI Patentability Affirmed: Madras High Court Rules in Favor of SyngenePharmacyclics Divisional Patent Application Upheld by Calcutta High Court
Calcutta High Court upholds Pharmacyclics divisional patent application for ibrutinib-anti-CD20 therapy, interpreting Section 16 of the Patents Act, 1970.
Read more about Pharmacyclics Divisional Patent Application Upheld by Calcutta High CourtDelhi High Court Patent Injunction: Aquestia Wins Against Automat Industries
Delhi High Court grants patent injunction to Aquestia, stopping Automat from selling Hydromat valves over suspected patent infringement.
Read more about Delhi High Court Patent Injunction: Aquestia Wins Against Automat IndustriesPatent Upheld, Design Dismissed: Dura-Line vs. Jain Irrigation – Part 2: Counterclaim
The Delhi High Court rejected Jain Irrigation’s counterclaim challenging the validity of Dura-Line’s patent.
The Court upheld the patent, finding it novel, inventive, and sufficiently disclosed.