The Calcutta High Court set aside the rejection of a patent application filed by UPL Ltd., involving innovative fungicidal combinations. The Court found that the rejection order issued by the Controller lacked detailed reasoning and had procedural deficiencies, particularly concerning inventive step and treatment of experimental data.
Read more about Not Just a Mix: Court Finds Merit in UPL’s Fungicidal FormulationAuthor: Anjali Santhosh
Anjali Santhosh is an experienced Patent Attorney with BananaIP Counsels, a reputed IP firm. She serves as a contributor to Intellepedia, where she shares insights on Patent Law and evolving innovation trends.
The views expressed in her articles and posts on Intellepedia are personal and do not represent those of BananaIP Counsels or its members.
Patent Rejection for Vehicle Monitoring System reversed by Court
The Madras High Court allowed the appeal filed by TVS Motor Company against the rejection of its patent application pertaining to a Vehicle Monitoring System. The Court observed that the Controller had not adequately examined the validity of the cited prior art and had failed to provide a reasoned analysis with respect to the inventive step. Consequently, the matter was remanded to a different Controller for fresh consideration.
Read more about Patent Rejection for Vehicle Monitoring System reversed by Court