Trademark Injunction | Intellepedia

PAAKASHALA Brand Wins Trademark Injunction: Karnataka HC Rules Against Descriptive Use Defense

An artistic and colorful image of various fruits, vegetables, and food items flying or exploding outward from the center. The composition includes items like tomatoes, bell peppers, onions, broccoli, pineapple, bread rolls, and leafy greens, all suspended mid-air. There are also stylized humanoid food figures interacting with the scene, creating a lively and surreal food battle effect against a bright background.

In a dispute over the restaurant brand PAAKASHALA, the Karnataka High Court restrained a Mysuru outlet from using a similar name. The Court found that the plaintiff, a registered trademark owner, had made out a prima facie case of infringement.

Glaxo’s BETNESOL vs Zee’s BETNEVIN : Who do you BET on?

The Delhi High Court enforced an injunction against BETNEVIN, holding it infringed Glaxo’s BETNESOL trademark. The Court clarified that infringement can be determined in execution proceedings to enforce trademark decrees in India.

Lights out for “Everyday” Lighters : Injunction in favour of EVEREADY

The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction against KSC Industries, restraining them from using the EVERYDAY mark, which was found similar to Eveready’s well-known EVEREADY trademarks. The Court considered visual, structural, and phonetic similarities and recognised the potential for consumer confusion.

Trademark removal only after notice, and Fly Hi/Timespro Injunctions

This post discusses key Indian trademark cases on removal and injunctions, with courts emphasising notice requirements for removal and granting injunctions against Fly Hi and Timespro infringers. The analysis highlights recent judicial trends in trademark protection.

Courts Award Litigation Costs In Recent Trademark Infringement Cases

Recent Delhi High Court decisions in trademark infringement cases have seen courts awarding litigation costs to plaintiffs along with injunctions and damages. The post analyses how courts assess costs, either on actual litigation expenses or through reasonable estimates, providing objective insights based on reviewed judgments.

CASE BRIEF: KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION VS. RAMAN GUPTA AND ORS.

The Delhi High Court addressed trademark infringement claims by Khadi & Village Industries Commission against Khadi by Heritage. The Court found deceptive similarities and granted an injunction, underscoring the significance of brand reputation and public trust in trademark cases.

Latest Trademark Cases in 2021 – Part 13

This post provides updates on notable trademark cases in India from 2021, including court rulings on infringement and injunctions. Key judgments are summarised to offer insights into current legal trends in Indian trademark law.

Audi taken for a ride

The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction restraining Audi AG from using the TT mark for selected goods in India, supporting TT Industries’ trademark rights. The order underscores the strength of prior registration and the scope of protection for Indian trademark holders.