Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) is pursuing legal action against the film Phantom, alleging misrepresentation and violations of neutrality principles. The dispute includes claims of defamation, trademark, and copyright infringement, highlighting legal challenges for filmmakers depicting real-world organizations.
Read more about MSF Initiates Legal Action Against ‘Phantom’Tag: Trademark Infringement
Will ALPHABET get Google into Trademark Trouble?
Google’s adoption of ALPHABET as its holding company name has raised important trademark questions, particularly in light of prior registrations by BMW and others. The analysis explores the legal risks Google may face under Indian trademark law.
Read more about Will ALPHABET get Google into Trademark Trouble?Zara Trademark Saga: History Repeats Itself
The Zara trademark saga demonstrates how Indian courts protect well-known trademarks against brand name misuse, even across different industries. The Delhi High Court’s decision reinforces the critical role of names in intellectual property disputes.
Read more about Zara Trademark Saga: History Repeats ItselfLionsgate sues Ameritrade for using ‘Dirty Dancing’ dialogue
Lionsgate initiated legal action against Ameritrade over the use of a famous Dirty Dancing dialogue in an advertisement. The case examines whether the ad’s parodic reference constitutes trademark infringement or falls under permissible parody in advertising.
Read more about Lionsgate sues Ameritrade for using ‘Dirty Dancing’ dialogueCease and desist notice to Snapdeal
Nalli issued a cease and desist notice to Snapdeal for alleged unauthorised use of its trademark and images. The incident highlights ongoing legal debates concerning the liability of e-commerce platforms for the actions of their sellers in India.
Read more about Cease and desist notice to SnapdealPeps Industries Vs. Shakti Mattresses & Gears
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Peps Industries, restraining Shakti Mattresses from using the SPINE GUARD trademark. This case highlights trademark protection in India’s mattress industry.
Read more about Peps Industries Vs. Shakti Mattresses & GearsThis town isn’t enough for the two of us : Zara Trademark Dispute
This post discusses the Delhi High Court’s ruling in the Zara trademark dispute, focusing on trademark protection and the legal reasoning behind the decision. The analysis highlights the court’s approach to brand rights and infringement in India.
Read more about This town isn’t enough for the two of us : Zara Trademark DisputeIs There a Trademark in a Name?
This post explores whether a name can serve as a trademark in India, focusing on legal battles involving educational institutions. Analysing the VIT case, it discusses trademark infringement, passing off, and the significance of well known marks in Indian law.
Read more about Is There a Trademark in a Name?Trademark Case Review: PEPS Industries v. Coir Foam
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Peps Industries, restraining Coirfoam India from using marks similar to ‘Spring Guard’. The case underscores critical principles of trademark protection and interim relief in Indian law.
Read more about Trademark Case Review: PEPS Industries v. Coir FoamExisting Trademark blocks Apple Watch sale in Switzerland
Apple cannot launch the Apple Watch in Switzerland due to a prior trademark owned by Leonard, covering both the name and logo. This restriction highlights the legal challenges of international intellectual property enforcement.
Read more about Existing Trademark blocks Apple Watch sale in Switzerland