ITC’s Nicotine Device Patent Rejection on Public Health Grounds Set Aside

Text reading "Intent, Not Harm, Defines Section 3(b)" displayed in bold white font on a dark smoky background Featured image for article: ITC’s Nicotine Device Patent Rejection on Public Health Grounds Set Aside

The Calcutta High Court has set aside the refusal of ITC’s patent application for a nicotine aerosol device. The Court found that the Controller’s reliance on morality grounds under Section 3(b) was improper and unsupported by cited documents, ensuring a fresh review of the patent.

Read more about ITC’s Nicotine Device Patent Rejection on Public Health Grounds Set Aside

What Have You Been Smoking? Personal bias has no place in Tobacco patent evaluation

A cigarette crossed out with a red prohibition sign, flanked by comic-style text bubbles reading "WHAT?" on the left and "WHY!" on the right, against a blue background Featured image for article: What Have You Been Smoking? Personal bias has no place in Tobacco patent evaluation

The Calcutta High Court has criticised the arbitrary rejection of a tobacco syrup patent by the Indian patent office, urging objective analysis over personal bias. It held that Section 3(b) must not be misused to deny legitimate inventions without proper legal scrutiny and evidence.

Read more about What Have You Been Smoking? Personal bias has no place in Tobacco patent evaluation

Morality and Patentability of Sexual Inventions

The Indian Patent Office often raises morality objections to sexual inventions, particularly in the context of devices and aids. This post analyses such objections, the legal framework under Section 3(b), and the shift towards constitutional morality post the Supreme Court’s 377 judgment. It highlights the need for consistent and rights-based evaluation in patentability decisions.

Read more about Morality and Patentability of Sexual Inventions