No Breeze For Atomberg’s Design Claim: Bombay High Court Says Pigeon Fan Looks Different

llustration of a pigeon beside vintage fans representing the Atomberg v Stove Kraft design infringement and passing off dispute. Featured image for article: No Breeze For Atomberg’s Design Claim: Bombay High Court Says Pigeon Fan Looks Different

In the case of Atomberg Technologies Private Limited v Stove Kraft Limited, the Bombay High Court dealt with a design infringement and passing off dispute relating to ceiling fans. Atomberg alleged that Stove Kraft’s Pigeon fan copied its registered fan design, but the Court refused interim relief after finding that the proper comparison had to be made with the registered design and not with later product models. The Court also found visible differences between the rival fans and held that Atomberg had not established goodwill in the particular get up of the suit fan for passing off.

Read more about No Breeze For Atomberg’s Design Claim: Bombay High Court Says Pigeon Fan Looks Different

Can You Copyright a Product Photo When Design Is Registered? Madras HC Clarifies

A wooden desk with engineering blueprints and technical drawings spread out. Two printed photographs of a pump assembly lie on the blueprints. Featured image for article: Can You Copyright a Product Photo When Design Is Registered? Madras HC Clarifies

The Madras High Court has clarified that a product photograph can be copyrighted even if the product’s design is registered. The Court held that Section 15(1) of the Copyright Act does not bar copyright in a photograph of a registered design, as the two are distinct forms of intellectual property.

Read more about Can You Copyright a Product Photo When Design Is Registered? Madras HC Clarifies

Toy Building Block Design: Defendant’s silence equals admission of infringement

Banner with toy building blocks and cartoon children, featuring the title 'Toy Building Block Design: Defendant's silence equals admission of infringement Featured image for article: Toy Building Block Design: Defendant’s silence equals admission of infringement

Introduction In this case, Bol7 Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (“Bol7” or “Plaintiff”) filed a suit for a permanent injunction against Flipkart Internet Private Limited & Ors....

Read more about Toy Building Block Design: Defendant’s silence equals admission of infringement

Pidilite Contains Astral from infringing its Container Design

The Bombay High Court has restrained Astral from infringing Pidilite’s registered container design, finding substantial similarity and upholding the design’s novelty and distinctiveness. The judgment clarifies key aspects of visual appeal and prior publication in Indian design law.

Read more about Pidilite Contains Astral from infringing its Container Design