Skip to content

Intellepedia

IP News Center

  • Home
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyrights
  • Designs
  • Trade Secrets

Tag: Peps Industries

Peps Industries Vs. Shakti Mattresses & Gears

Author: Intellepedia
June 16, 2015
Intellectual Property, Trademarks

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Peps Industries, restraining Shakti Mattresses from using the SPINE GUARD trademark. This case highlights trademark protection in India’s mattress industry.

READ MORE Read more about Peps Industries Vs. Shakti Mattresses & Gears

Trademark Case Review: PEPS Industries v. Coir Foam

Author: Intellepedia
May 27, 2015
Intellectual Property, Trademarks

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Peps Industries, restraining Coirfoam India from using marks similar to ‘Spring Guard’. The case underscores critical principles of trademark protection and interim relief in Indian law.

READ MORE Read more about Trademark Case Review: PEPS Industries v. Coir Foam

Case Review: Hypnos Ltd. v. PEPS Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors

Author: Intellepedia
April 24, 2015
Intellectual Property, Trademarks

The IPAB’s decision in Hypnos Ltd. v. PEPS Industries addresses the requirements for proving trans-border reputation and well-known status in Indian trademark disputes. The Board’s approach highlights the importance of local use and robust evidence in rectification proceedings.

READ MORE Read more about Case Review: Hypnos Ltd. v. PEPS Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors

Categories

IP News

Trending Posts

  • Delhi HC Orders Xiaomi to Pay ₹272 Crore in Standard Essential Patent (SEP) Dispute
  • Senior Trademark Associate Opening for Professionals with 5+ Years of Trademark Experience
  • Patent Rights Protected Despite NBA Approval Delay: Fresh Examination Directed
  • Delhi High Court Revisits the Scope of Section 3(d) in Agrochemical Patents
  • 10 Day IP Practice Courses to Build Practice Ready Professionals for an AI Enabled Practice
  • Senior Trademark Associate Opening for Professionals with 5+ Years of Trademark Experience
  • Design Is Not a Shield: Delhi High Court on Patent Infringement in the Packaging Industry
  • Why Owning a Logo Doesn't Mean Owning Its Letters - the A TO Z' Trademark Dispute
  • All the Trappings! Bombay High Court Bars Second Patent Appeals
  • AI and the Future of In-House IP Counsel Jobs in India: Which Roles Will Survive?

Featured Posts

  • AI and the Future of In-House IP Counsel Jobs in India: Which Roles Will Survive?
  • Delhi HC Orders Xiaomi to Pay ₹272 Crore in Standard Essential Patent (SEP) Dispute
  • Copyright Enforcement, Quick Court Orders, and the Rise of Intimidatory Tactics
  • Design Is Not a Shield: Delhi High Court on Patent Infringement in the Packaging Industry
  • Patent Attorneys: From Strategic Professionals to Ordinary Vendors? The Changing Soul of India’s Patent Ecosystem
  • Breaking Beams, Breaking Records: Delhi High Court Awards ₹152 Crore in Antenna Patent Infringement Suit Against Rosenberger
  • Artificial Intelligence in IP Practice: Managing Psychological Trauma, Stress, and Anxiety in a Changing Landscape
  • Wanted Dead or Alive: Delhi High Court Holds Patent Revocation Survives Expiry and Section 107 Defence
  • Safeguarding Digital Identity in the age of Deepfakes: An analytical study of AI regulation in India with special reference to Personality Rights jurisprudence
  • Gen AI, Copyrights, and Hybrid Licensing in India Why the Assumptions May Not Sustain the Model

Random Posts

  • Mist in the Machine, Haze in the Reasoning: Court Reiterates Mandatory Five-Step Test for Inventive Step
  • Isha and Sadhguru: Jurisdiction and Defamation in the Age of Online Content
  • Trademark: ‘One For All’, Distinct For One? Delhi High Court Says Yes
  • Shatrughan Sinha and the Legal Fight Against Digital Impersonation
  • AI and the Future of In-House IP Counsel Jobs in India: Which Roles Will Survive?
  • AI Inventorship and the DABUS Refusal in India: Patent Opponent’s Submissions in the Patent Office Order
  • OLIVE Trademark Case: Delhi High Court on Section 11 & Prior User Rights
  • Copy Paste Creativity Fails the Originality Test
  • Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition Are Independent Proceedings; Composite Disposal Unsustainable
  • Amendment of claims at Appellate Stage under section 59 of the Patents Act

Convert Documents to Accessible Formats

https://www.robobraille.org/

Visit BananaIP Counsels Website

https://www.bananaip.com

Disclaimer

Intellepedia is an independent knowledge sharing initiative of BananaIP. All content on this website is intended solely for general information and educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney client or advocate client relationship. This website and its content do not amount to advertisement, solicitation or inducement of any kind for legal or professional services. All opinions expressed by individual authors are their own and do not reflect the views or positions of BananaIP or any organisation or firm with which they may be affiliated.

We welcome your questions, suggestions and corrections. If you are interested in contributing as an author, please write to us. Intellectual property experts and professionals from all related fields are welcome to participate.

Contribute to Intellepedia

contact@intellepedia.org

Archives

  • Home
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyrights
  • Designs
  • Trade Secrets

© 2026 Intellepedia. All Rights Reserved.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement