Role of ‘Intent’ in Reviving lost Patents and Patent Applications in India

This post examines how intent now plays a decisive role in reviving lost patents and patent applications in India, following recent Delhi High Court guidance. It outlines when missed deadlines may be remedied and the evidentiary standards required from applicants seeking restoration.

Read more about Role of ‘Intent’ in Reviving lost Patents and Patent Applications in India

Provisional Patent Application Vs. Complete Patent Application

This article examines provisional and complete patent applications, outlining their differences, advantages, and the implications for inventors in India. It offers a clear comparison to help inventors decide which application suits their needs, stressing the importance of complete disclosure for legal protection.

Read more about Provisional Patent Application Vs. Complete Patent Application

Without Proper Inventive Step Analysis, Patent Office’s Order is Unreasoned – Says Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court set aside a Patent Office order rejecting Gogoro Inc’s application for lack of inventive step, citing inadequate reasoning. The case was remanded for proper analysis under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act.

Read more about Without Proper Inventive Step Analysis, Patent Office’s Order is Unreasoned – Says Delhi High Court

Divisional Applications cannot exceed scope of Parent Application: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified that divisional applications under the Patents Act must not exceed the scope of the parent application and require plurality of inventions in the original claims. This decision reinforces the primacy of claims in determining the scope of patent protection.

Read more about Divisional Applications cannot exceed scope of Parent Application: Delhi High Court

CASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.

The Delhi High Court’s decision in Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India addresses key procedural and substantive aspects of post grant patent opposition in India. The judgment clarifies evidentiary requirements, parties’ rights regarding Opposition Board reports, and the strict timelines under the Patents Act and Rules.

Read more about CASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court asks the Patent Office to decide on amendments and give adequate opportunity in Opposition Proceedings

The Delhi High Court has provided clear procedural guidance for patent opposition proceedings, focusing on transparency and fair opportunity for all parties. The judgment underscores the importance of timely decisions on claim amendments and systematic handling of pre-grant oppositions by the Indian Patent Office.

Read more about Delhi High Court asks the Patent Office to decide on amendments and give adequate opportunity in Opposition Proceedings

Post-Grant Patent Opposition, Evidence and Hearings: Role of Patent Office, Opposition Board, and Parties

This post provides an analytical overview of the procedures and legal standards for post-grant patent opposition in India. It examines the Delhi High Court’s guidance on evidence, hearings, and the respective roles of the Patent Office and Opposition Board, underscoring the need for transparency and timely adjudication.

Read more about Post-Grant Patent Opposition, Evidence and Hearings: Role of Patent Office, Opposition Board, and Parties