The Madras High Court held that a system for selectively concealing physical addresses in e-commerce is not a business method under Section 3k. The decision clarifies the distinction between technological inventions and business method exclusions in Indian patent law.
Read more about Is a system for ‘Selectively Displaying Physical Address’ unpatentable as a business method?Tag: patent case analysis
Product by Process Patent Claims are Product Claims, not Process Claims, rules the Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has ruled that product by process patent claims are to be treated as product claims, not process claims, for both patentability and infringement analysis. This judgment clarifies the legal position and ensures consistent standards for evaluating pharmaceutical and other complex inventions in India.
Read more about Product by Process Patent Claims are Product Claims, not Process Claims, rules the Delhi High CourtInventive Step – Technical Advance
The post analyses an IPAB decision on the patentability of a chaos theoretical exponent value calculation system under Section 3(k) of the Indian Patents Act. It discusses the distinction between technical advance and excluded subject matter in the context of inventive step.
Read more about Inventive Step – Technical AdvanceCase Review: Garaware v. Techfeb
This case review analyses the Garware v Techfeb patent, focusing on the specification’s drafting and the relevance of prior art. The post raises questions about the invention’s novelty and examines the omission of gabion systems in the background section.
Read more about Case Review: Garaware v. Techfeb