Madras High Court | Intellepedia

Chand-z Vs. Chand-A For Lungis: Chand-A trademark is not infringing as the use is honest and concurrent, says the Madras High Court.

The Madras High Court ruled that the Chand-A trademark for lungis is not infringing due to honest and concurrent use. The decision clarifies key principles for establishing such use in trademark disputes.

Refusal of Patent for “Image Construction Apparatus” based on Section 3(k) and Inventive Step set aside by the Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside a patent refusal for an image construction apparatus, citing insufficient reasoning under Section 3(k) and inventive step. The Court remanded the matter for reconsideration, highlighting the importance of well-reasoned decisions in patent law.

Reversal of unreasoned and invalid Patent refusals based on Section 3(d), Novelty, and Inventive Step

This post reviews three High Court decisions reversing unreasoned patent refusals in India, focusing on Section 3(d), novelty, and inventive step. The courts stressed the need for considering applicant submissions and proper reasoning in refusal orders.

Premier Vs. Barclays Premier League, Apollo Mark Well-Known Status?, and Roobini Vs. Rubam Trademark Cases

This post examines recent trademark cases from Indian courts, discussing composite mark analysis, well-known mark recognition, and the standard for confusion. Key judgments on Barclays Premier League, Apollo, and Roobini vs. Rubam offer practical guidance for trademark strategy and compliance.

Madras High Court Rulings on Patent Application Refusals

Recent Madras High Court rulings have clarified the standards for refusing patent applications in India. The Court emphasized the need for clear, detailed reasoning in refusals, ensuring transparency and fairness in the patent examination process.

Divisional Patent Filing, Patent Claim Amendments, Assessment of Damages, and DUS test for PV Protection

This post reviews significant Indian judgments on divisional patent filings, claim amendments, damages, and plant variety protection. It highlights key legal principles regarding patent and plant variety jurisprudence in India.

Madras High Court’s Progressive Stance on Patent Claim Amendments and Other Aspects

The Madras High Court has delivered important rulings on patent claim amendments, exclusions, and rejection protocols under Indian law. These decisions clarify key patentability standards and reinforce the necessity for precise drafting and strategic approach by patent professionals.

Deciphering India’s Design Law: A Series on Noteworthy Judgments (Part 3)

This post reviews significant judgments shaping India’s design law, covering issues of novelty, marking, and payment for design services. It offers objective, analytical insights into recent court decisions relevant to the design patent landscape.

Key Judgments on Movie Rights Assignments from Madras High Court | Case Notes

This article analyses recent Madras High Court judgments on movie rights assignments in Tamil cinema. It highlights the court’s stance on the validity, clarity, and order of assignment agreements, offering essential legal insights for industry stakeholders.

This post summarises key copyright cases decided by Indian courts in 2022, focusing on originality, licensing, and infringement issues. It offers an objective analysis of court findings and their implications for Indian copyright law.

Tag: Madras High Court