ITC’s Nicotine Device Patent Rejection on Public Health Grounds Set Aside

Text reading "Intent, Not Harm, Defines Section 3(b)" displayed in bold white font on a dark smoky background Featured image for article: ITC’s Nicotine Device Patent Rejection on Public Health Grounds Set Aside

The Calcutta High Court has set aside the refusal of ITC’s patent application for a nicotine aerosol device. The Court found that the Controller’s reliance on morality grounds under Section 3(b) was improper and unsupported by cited documents, ensuring a fresh review of the patent.

Read more about ITC’s Nicotine Device Patent Rejection on Public Health Grounds Set Aside

ITC’s injunction against Arpita Agro upheld

ITC’s Injunction Against Arpita Agro Upheld Featured image for article: ITC’s injunction against Arpita Agro upheld

The Delhi High Court upheld ITC’s injunction against Arpita Agro, restraining the company from using the trademark ‘POWRNYM.’ The Court ruled that the mark was deceptively similar to ITC’s ‘NIMYLE’ and ‘JOR-POWR,’ violating trademark rights. The judgment emphasized that contractual obligations and trade dress similarities must be strictly adhered to in trademark disputes.

Read more about ITC’s injunction against Arpita Agro upheld

Samsung in Trouble over Smartwatches, Lifebuoy Trademark Victory, ITC Wins GI Infringement Case and Other News

The post examines recent developments in Indian and international trademark law, including the Lifebuoy trademark victory, ITC’s GI infringement case, and Samsung’s ongoing legal challenges. It provides structured legal updates and practical insights on brand protection.

Read more about Samsung in Trouble over Smartwatches, Lifebuoy Trademark Victory, ITC Wins GI Infringement Case and Other News