Latest Trademark Cases in 2021 – Part 6
This post reviews three recent Bombay High Court decisions on trademark and copyright infringement from 2021. It highlights key legal findings on interim injunctions, trademark use in media,…
interim injunction
49 articles
Latest Patent Cases in 2021 – Part 2
This article summarises pivotal Delhi High Court decisions on patent disputes in 2021, particularly involving pharmaceutical products. The analysis covers interim injunctions and key arguments in Indian patent…
Temporary Injunction: Mariappan Vs. A.R. Safiullah
This post analyses the Mariappan vs AR Safiullah case on temporary injunctions in Indian patent disputes. The court scrutinised inventive step and the requirements for interim relief, ultimately…
Temporary Injunction: J. Mitra Vs. Kesar Medicaments
In J. Mitra Vs. Kesar Medicaments, the Court examined criteria for granting a temporary injunction in a patent infringement suit. The analysis considered patent validity, infringement, and the…
Temporary Injunction: Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works
This post discusses the denial of a temporary injunction in Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, focusing on patent validity and the criteria for interim relief in Indian…
Bajaj-TVS Litigation
The Bajaj-TVS litigation explores the complexities of enforcing patent rights in the Indian motorcycle industry. Courts examined the validity and scope of patents, ultimately finding the technologies distinct…
Peps Industries Vs. Shakti Mattresses & Gears
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Peps Industries, restraining Shakti Mattresses from using the SPINE GUARD trademark. This case highlights trademark protection in India's mattress…
Trademark Case Review: PEPS Industries v. Coir Foam
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Peps Industries, restraining Coirfoam India from using marks similar to ‘Spring Guard’. The case underscores critical principles of trademark…
Are Applicants Allowed to Later Refute Their Own Submissions at TM Prosecution?
The Delhi High Court recently ruled that applicants cannot later refute their own submissions made during trademark prosecution. The judgment underscores the significance of consistent representations, especially concerning…