Wieden Kennedy sued Jindal Steel for copyright infringement over an advertisement, leading to a Delhi High Court order for arbitration and a monetary deposit. The Court declined an interim injunction, citing balance of convenience and contractual arbitration provisions.
Read more about Ad Agency sues Jindal Steels for Copyright InfringementTag: Intellectual Property
No more ‘Social’izing for Social chai
The Delhi High Court has restrained Social Chai from using the “SOCIAL” mark, finding trademark infringement and a likelihood of consumer confusion. The dispute highlights the importance of trademark protection in the restaurant industry.
Read more about No more ‘Social’izing for Social chaiCall for Feedback: CGPDTM Service Excellence Survey 2024
The Office of CGPDTM has announced its Service Excellence Survey 2024 to collect stakeholder feedback for improving IP administration. Stakeholders are encouraged to submit their responses by 22 April 2024.
Read more about Call for Feedback: CGPDTM Service Excellence Survey 2024Exploring Patent Hold Up, Royalty Stacking, and Hold Out – Ericsson v. Lava – Part 3
This post discusses patent hold up, royalty stacking, and hold out in the context of the Ericsson v Lava dispute. The analysis highlights the Court’s reliance on evidence while addressing FRAND licensing arguments and SEP enforcement in India.
Read more about Exploring Patent Hold Up, Royalty Stacking, and Hold Out – Ericsson v. Lava – Part 3Google’s Patent appeal dismissed, fine of 1 Lakh imposed
The Delhi High Court dismissed Google’s appeal against the rejection of its patent application, finding no inventive step over prior art. A fine of Rs.1 lakh was also imposed on Google for incorrect disclosure regarding its European patent application.
Read more about Google’s Patent appeal dismissed, fine of 1 Lakh imposedCiting gross delay and strong likelihood of confusion, court refuses CEAT’s appeal
The Delhi High Court dismissed CEAT’s appeal against the refusal of its FARMAX trademark, citing substantial delay and likelihood of confusion with prior marks. The court found the marks similar and the goods closely related, upholding the Registrar’s refusal.
Read more about Citing gross delay and strong likelihood of confusion, court refuses CEAT’s appealNo monopoly rights over common surnames such as JINDAL, court dismisses injunction petition.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an interim injunction plea, holding that the use of the common surname JINDAL cannot be monopolised under trademark law. The court found no infringement or passing off, as the impugned mark was sufficiently distinct.
Read more about No monopoly rights over common surnames such as JINDAL, court dismisses injunction petition.Patent (Amendment) Rules 2024 come into effect, significant changes introduced.
The Patent (Amendment) Rules 2024 bring notable procedural changes to the Indian patent system, including shorter timelines, new forms, and updated requirements. These amendments aim to simplify processes and enhance compliance for patent applicants and patentees.
Read more about Patent (Amendment) Rules 2024 come into effect, significant changes introduced.The changing dynamics of Infringement, Stay of Suit and damages in Trademark Cases
This post discusses recent High Court decisions on trademark infringement, stay of suit, and damages in India. It offers an objective analysis of key legal principles and practical implications for trademark litigation.
Read more about The changing dynamics of Infringement, Stay of Suit and damages in Trademark CasesCourts Weigh on Inordinate Delay in Patent Orders and Scope of Claim Amendments
The Delhi and Madras High Courts recently set aside patent refusal orders, addressing inordinate delays and the scope of permissible claim amendments. These judgments clarify key patent law principles and reinforce procedural fairness in India.
Read more about Courts Weigh on Inordinate Delay in Patent Orders and Scope of Claim Amendments