The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Peps Industries, restraining Shakti Mattresses from using the SPINE GUARD trademark. This case highlights trademark protection in India’s mattress industry.
Read more about Peps Industries Vs. Shakti Mattresses & GearsTag: Delhi High Court
This town isn’t enough for the two of us : Zara Trademark Dispute
This post discusses the Delhi High Court’s ruling in the Zara trademark dispute, focusing on trademark protection and the legal reasoning behind the decision. The analysis highlights the court’s approach to brand rights and infringement in India.
Read more about This town isn’t enough for the two of us : Zara Trademark DisputeTrademark Case Review: PEPS Industries v. Coir Foam
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Peps Industries, restraining Coirfoam India from using marks similar to ‘Spring Guard’. The case underscores critical principles of trademark protection and interim relief in Indian law.
Read more about Trademark Case Review: PEPS Industries v. Coir FoamXiaomi maintains competitive pricing; Removes onus of Royalties on customers
Xiaomi faces a patent dispute in India but continues to offer competitively priced smartphones. The company leverages its agreements with Qualcomm and focuses on risk mitigation while maintaining its commitment to Indian customers.
Read more about Xiaomi maintains competitive pricing; Removes onus of Royalties on customersRoyalties for Singers – Delhi High Court passes a favorable order
The Delhi High Court has issued an order supporting ISRA in a case concerning unpaid royalties for singers. This decision marks a significant advancement in Indian performers rights and copyright enforcement.
Read more about Royalties for Singers – Delhi High Court passes a favorable orderHow to Determine Well Knownness of a Trademark – Part 1 -Trade Marks Act, 1999
This post discusses the key statutory and judicial factors for determining the well knownness of a trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. It highlights the legal criteria and relevant case law, emphasising the need for jurisdiction-specific evidence.
Read more about How to Determine Well Knownness of a Trademark – Part 1 -Trade Marks Act, 1999Are Applicants Allowed to Later Refute Their Own Submissions at TM Prosecution?
The Delhi High Court recently ruled that applicants cannot later refute their own submissions made during trademark prosecution. The judgment underscores the significance of consistent representations, especially concerning generic terms in trademark disputes within the news industry.
Read more about Are Applicants Allowed to Later Refute Their Own Submissions at TM Prosecution?