Delhi High Court | Intellepedia

Another dynamic plus order to curb online piracy from the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has granted a dynamic plus injunction to Universal Studios against rogue websites facilitating online piracy. The order extends protections to future infringing sites and empowers ISPs and registrars to block access and share ownership information.

Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench.

The Delhi High Court is reconsidering the proper jurisdiction for filing trademark rectification petitions. The question has been referred to a larger Bench for a definitive decision, with significant implications for trademark law in India.

Refusal of a patent application based on prior art not cited in hearing notice set aside by the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court set aside a patent refusal where the Controller relied on prior art not cited in the hearing notice. The decision underscores the importance of fair opportunity and proper analysis in patent proceedings in India.

Inventive Step analysis requires a rigorous examination, not surface analysis, says the Delhi High Court.

The Delhi High Court criticised the Controller of Patents for a superficial inventive step analysis in a recent patent refusal, emphasising the need for rigorous and well-reasoned assessments. The Court has directed a fresh hearing, highlighting the standards required under Indian patent law.

Trademark opposition timelines are mandatory, and must be complied strictly, says the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court clarified that trademark opposition timelines are mandatory and not subject to extension by the Registrar. The Court reinstated an opposition abandoned due to a minor delay in service, emphasizing strict statutory compliance.

Method of producing ‘protein enriched blood serum’ is not a method of treatment under Section 3(i), says the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court ruled that a method of producing protein enriched blood serum is not a method of treatment under Section 3(i) of the Patents Act. The Court set aside the refusal and directed the Patent Office to reconsider the application after a fresh hearing.

Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench

The Delhi High Court has raised an important question about the proper forum for filing trademark rectification petitions in India. The issue centres on whether jurisdiction should be limited to the High Court overseeing the relevant trademark office or extended to any High Court.

Use of the Trademark ‘Candlelight’ for Musical Concerts restrained by the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction against the use of the ‘Candlelight’ trademark for concerts, siding with Fever Labs in a passing off dispute. The ruling highlights the protection of unregistered but distinctive trademarks in India’s live entertainment sector.

Product by Process Patent Claims are Product Claims, not Process Claims, rules the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has ruled that product by process patent claims are to be treated as product claims, not process claims, for both patentability and infringement analysis. This judgment clarifies the legal position and ensures consistent standards for evaluating pharmaceutical and other complex inventions in India.

Use of Akshay Tanna’s persona and reputation on social media for investment scams taken down

The Delhi High Court has ordered the removal of social media accounts impersonating Akshay Tanna for investment scams. The Court granted an exparte injunction, restraining further misuse of his persona for fraudulent purposes.