In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court upheld the decision to refuse CEAT Limited’s trademark application for “FARMAX.” Citing significant delay and potential confusion with existing marks, the Court dismissed the appeal. The decision underscores the importance of timely action and highlights the necessity for distinctiveness in trademark applications. Learn more about the case: Ceat Limited vs The Registrar Of Trade Marks.
Read more about Citing gross delay and strong likelihood of confusion, court refuses CEAT’s appealTag: Condonation of delay
CASE BRIEF : Parvesh Kamboj & Ors. vs The Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks
Facts The Delhi High Court (the Court) merged four Writ petitions filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. The Petitioners had been restricted...
Read more about CASE BRIEF : Parvesh Kamboj & Ors. vs The Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade MarksComments and suggestions on the Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2015
The Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion ("DIPP") issued a notification on October 26, 2015 publishing the draft Patents (Amendment)...
Read more about Comments and suggestions on the Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2015