The post reviews major Indian copyright cases from 2021, addressing disputes in film and music rights. It presents clear, objective analysis of court decisions and legal reasoning, offering valuable insights for IP professionals and stakeholders.
Read more about Latest Indian Copyright Cases – 2021 – Part 2Tag: Bombay High Court
Latest Trademark Cases in 2021 – Part 2
This post summarises notable Indian trademark cases from 2021, focusing on court decisions about injunctions and infringement. It provides an analytical overview of judicial reasoning in recent trademark disputes.
Read more about Latest Trademark Cases in 2021 – Part 2Bombay High Court Vacates Injunction Granted to ISKCON, Burberry Fights Baneberry and more
The Bombay High Court has revoked an injunction in the ISKCON trademark case due to new developments and pending Supreme Court proceedings. The post also reviews recent legal actions by Burberry and Chanel, as well as updates in brand licensing, domain disputes, and geographical indications in India.
Read more about Bombay High Court Vacates Injunction Granted to ISKCON, Burberry Fights Baneberry and moreBombay HC Restrains Andaman Xtasea from Using ‘Big Boss’ Trademark, Mozambique Joins the Banjul Protocol and more
Bombay High Court has restrained Andaman Xtasea from using the Big Boss trademark in a recent interim order. The bulletin also covers Mozambique joining the Banjul Protocol, key brand licensing news, domain disputes, GI tag developments, and IP office deadline extensions in India.
Read more about Bombay HC Restrains Andaman Xtasea from Using ‘Big Boss’ Trademark, Mozambique Joins the Banjul Protocol and moreSummary of Indian Trademark Cases of 2019
This post summarises major Indian trademark cases of 2019, focusing on judicial reasoning in infringement and brand protection disputes. It analyses significant legal developments across sectors, reflecting the courts’ approach to trademark rights enforcement.
Read more about Summary of Indian Trademark Cases of 2019Summary of Indian Copyright, Entertainment Law Cases and Rules of 2019
A structured overview of significant Indian copyright and entertainment law cases from 2019, with analysis of court judgments and regulatory developments. This post highlights legal trends and provides insights into copyright enforcement and intermediary obligations in India.
Read more about Summary of Indian Copyright, Entertainment Law Cases and Rules of 2019Bombay High Court to hear urgent IP matters in chamber, CGPTDM-WIPO’s PCT Seminars in India again and more
This bulletin highlights urgent IP hearing procedures at the Bombay High Court and the return of WIPO-IPO PCT seminars in India. It also covers patent disputes, international IP conferences, and public training initiatives in intellectual property.
Read more about Bombay High Court to hear urgent IP matters in chamber, CGPTDM-WIPO’s PCT Seminars in India again and moreDoctrine of Foreign Equivalents – Part 2
This post explores how Indian courts interpret the Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents in trademark registration. Focusing on a Bombay High Court case, it highlights the legal reasoning and practical implications for marks using foreign words.
Read more about Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents – Part 2Bombay High Court Rules that CBFC has no ‘Intellectual Morality’,US Copyright Office forms a Mechanical Rights Society,Rapper Sues Insurance Company over Copyright Infringement Lawsuit, and more
The bulletin presents key legal updates on copyright infringement, entertainment law, and e-commerce regulation in India and internationally. It covers significant court rulings, new copyright societies, and policy changes, offering structured and factual analysis for legal professionals and stakeholders.
Read more about Bombay High Court Rules that CBFC has no ‘Intellectual Morality’,US Copyright Office forms a Mechanical Rights Society,Rapper Sues Insurance Company over Copyright Infringement Lawsuit, and moreKYUNKI SAAS BHI KABHI BAHU THI Vs. TIDE- Rights in a Cinematographic Work
The Bombay High Court in Star India v Leo Burnett analysed copyright infringement and passing off claims regarding a popular TV serial and a detergent commercial. The Court found no infringement or passing off, emphasizing the independent creation of the commercial and the absence of character merchandising.
Read more about KYUNKI SAAS BHI KABHI BAHU THI Vs. TIDE- Rights in a Cinematographic Work