Bombay High Court | Intellepedia

Patent Statistics, Interesting Inventions, Bombay HC orders Nuziveedu to pay Monsanto, Delhi HC dismisses suit filed by Crocs Inc and more patent news updates

This post covers Indian patent statistics, recent court decisions on patent infringement, and international IP developments. Notable cases include the Bombay High Court’s order in favour of Monsanto and the Delhi High Court’s decision regarding Crocs Inc. The analysis is structured and objective, reflecting current legal trends in intellectual property.

Doctrine of unclean hands- Now a defense in trademark infringement!

The Bombay High Court has introduced the doctrine of unclean hands as a defense in trademark infringement matters. If the plaintiff’s mark imitates another, relief may be denied. This ruling reshapes litigation strategies in Indian trademark law.

Laxmi Brooms and Trade Marks, Attari v. Nestlé , Ferrari’s Trade Mark Use, Saffron GI and more.

This post reviews key trade mark cases and news from India and abroad, including legal updates on religious names, infringement actions, and GI applications. It also covers trade mark licensing developments and practical tips for businesses.

Copyright assignment/licensing issues in movie sequels

This article discusses the legal dispute over copyright assignment and sequel rights in the Sarkar film series. The Bombay High Court held that remake rights were granted to Narendra Hirawat, while sequel rights remained with ZPC, clarifying crucial aspects of film copyright in India.

Film Expression and Censorship in India: Udta Punjab and Lipstick under my Burkah (Part 3)

This post explores landmark cases of film censorship in India, such as Udta Punjab and Lipstick Under My Burkha, and reviews how the CBFC’s decisions were challenged in court. It objectively analyses the legal reasoning and broader implications for freedom of expression in Indian cinema.

Hrithik, Beyonce, Infringement, Bombay High Court

This update explores recent copyright infringement cases before the Bombay High Court, shifts in entertainment licensing, and disputes around celebrity publicity rights. It analyses legal developments in digital media and government policies affecting the entertainment sector.

Sephora Cosmetics prevail over footwear, British MNC GlaxoSmithKline wins trademark infringement suit against GSK and more.

This weekly update examines key Indian trademark disputes, including Sephora’s resolution with a local footwear business and GlaxoSmithKline’s legal victory over GSK Life Sciences. It also discusses the Bombay High Court’s rationale in dismissing Vogue’s infringement suit.

Mohenjo Daro triumphs infringement battle

The Bombay High Court dismissed a copyright infringement suit against Mohenjo Daro, finding no substantial similarity with the plaintiff’s work. The judgement reinforced the need for clear evidence in film plagiarism claims.

Mohenjo Daro clears copyright infringement case

The Bombay High Court dismissed a copyright infringement claim against the makers of Mohenjo Daro, finding the allegations unsupported. The court imposed costs on the plaintiff and allowed the film’s release after CBFC approval.

John Doe Orders obtained by makers of ‘Sultan’

Yash Raj Films secured a John Doe order from the Bombay High Court to combat piracy of Sultan, allowing blocking of infringing links and restricting unauthorised broadcasts. This legal step demonstrates the effectiveness of copyright injunctions in protecting films against unlawful distribution.