Patents | Intellepedia

Patenting Inventions by Researchers in Universities

This article outlines essential legal guidelines for patenting inventions by university researchers in India. It discusses IP ownership, university policies, and the significance of correctly naming co-inventors in patent applications.

Temporary Injunction – F. Hoffmann-LA Roche Vs. Cipla

The Court refused a temporary injunction in the Roche vs Cipla patent dispute, highlighting non-disclosure, validity challenges, and public interest considerations. This analysis discusses the legal principles applied and the balance between patent rights and access to essential medicines.

First IP dialogue between India and US, Broadcom versus Volkswagen, Sony and Lenovo patent licensing deal, EPO Joins WIPO’s Digital Access Service and more

The post covers the first ever India US IP dialogue, highlighting key bilateral discussions on intellectual property policy. It also reports on notable patent disputes, licensing agreements, and significant updates from Indian and international patent offices.

Patenting a Food Recipe?

This post analyses the patentability of food recipes in India, focusing on exclusions under section 3 of the Indian Patent Act. It explores when a food recipe may qualify for patent protection and provides relevant examples from patent classification systems.

Is a Method of Massaging Patentable subject matter?

The post analyses whether massage methods can be patented in India, highlighting the distinction between non-medical and medical methods under Section 3(i) of the Patents Act. It references UK practice and suggests the Indian Patent Office may follow similar standards in the absence of direct precedents.

Temporary Injunction: Mariappan Vs. A.R. Safiullah

This post analyses the Mariappan vs AR Safiullah case on temporary injunctions in Indian patent disputes. The court scrutinised inventive step and the requirements for interim relief, ultimately denying the injunction due to lack of prima facie validity.

Temporary Injunction: J. Mitra Vs. Kesar Medicaments

In J. Mitra Vs. Kesar Medicaments, the Court examined criteria for granting a temporary injunction in a patent infringement suit. The analysis considered patent validity, infringement, and the balance of convenience, ultimately favouring interim relief for the patent holder.

Temporary Injunction: Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works

This post discusses the denial of a temporary injunction in Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, focusing on patent validity and the criteria for interim relief in Indian patent law. The Court’s analysis highlights the importance of a prima facie case and the impact of recent patents facing validity challenges.

Indian Patent Revocation: K. Manivannan, Vs. Shri M. Mani, Proprietor Valasumani Lathe Works

The Appellate Board dismissed the revocation request against Valasumani Lathe Works’ patent, finding no anticipation from prior art or abandoned applications. This decision clarifies key principles on anticipation and prior art for Indian patent law.

Zee’s New Patent may Tantalize all 5 senses, Video Conferencing Introduced by IPO, Nokia and Samsung Join Hands, IP Appellate Court in China and more

This update provides key highlights in Indian and global patent law, including Zee’s patent for sensory content, IPO’s virtual hearings, and Nokia-Samsung’s licensing extension. It also examines patent statistics and new IP initiatives from China.