The Delhi High Court recently refused to grant an interim injunction in the dispute between Forest Essentials and Baby Forest Ayurveda. The court held that “BABY FOREST” was not deceptively similar to “FOREST ESSENTIALS,” and that the word **“FOREST,” being a dictionary word, could not be monopolised without strong evidence of secondary meaning. Applying the anti dissection rule, the court concluded that the marks must be assessed as a whole and declined to interfere with the Single Judge’s refusal of interim relief.
Read more about Can Anyone Own the “Forest”? Delhi High Court Applies Anti Dissection Rule in Forest Essentials caseTag: Trademark Dispute India
CIT Trademark: Coimbatore Institute of Technology Prevails over Chennai Institute of Technology
The Madras High Court ruled that Coimbatore Institute of Technology’s prior use entitled it to exclusive rights over the CIT trademark. The court ordered the removal of the respondent’s registration, highlighting the importance of distinctiveness and transparency in trademark disputes.
Read more about CIT Trademark: Coimbatore Institute of Technology Prevails over Chennai Institute of Technology