Promised and Forgotten: How a Pre-Grant Opposition swallowed a hearing

A rusted file drawer label reading "Broken Promises" - representing the Controller of Patents' unfulfilled Section 14 hearing assurance in a pre-grant opposition case decided by the Bombay High Court. Featured image for article: Promised and Forgotten: How a Pre-Grant Opposition swallowed a hearing

The Bombay High Court, in AIC246 AG & Co. KG v. The Patent Office of India, has set aside a patent rejection that bypassed the mandatory Section 14 examination hearing, ruling that a pre-grant opposition hearing under Section 25(1) cannot substitute for an applicant’s statutory right to be heard before refusal.

Read more about Promised and Forgotten: How a Pre-Grant Opposition swallowed a hearing

Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition Are Independent Proceedings; Composite Disposal Unsustainable

Bold text reading “NO SHORTCUTS,” with “NO” in red and “SHORTCUTS” in white, set against a dark background featuring Court Featured image for article: Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition Are Independent Proceedings; Composite Disposal Unsustainable

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that the Controller cannot collapse examination and pre-grant opposition into a single composite order to sidestep a Section 14 hearing. The decision reinforces natural justice and procedural discipline in Indian patent prosecution.

Read more about Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition Are Independent Proceedings; Composite Disposal Unsustainable