The Bombay High Court ruled that cryptic and uncommunicated orders by the Registrar of Trade Marks violate procedural fairness. The court mandated a fresh review of the trademark application, reinforcing the importance of reasoned decisions in quasi judicial processes.
Read more about “Be mindful when exercising quasi judicial power, cryptic orders unacceptable” says Bombay High CourtTag: Registrar of Trade Marks
Wrong Documents Served, Abandonment of Opposition Set Aside
The Delhi High Court reversed the abandonment of a trademark opposition after it was found the Registrar had served incorrect documents. The order restores the original proceedings, emphasizing procedural fairness in Indian trademark law.
Read more about Wrong Documents Served, Abandonment of Opposition Set AsideOnly Officers having Quasi Judicial Authority Can Pass Trademark Orders, says the Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court has ruled that only officers with quasi judicial authority may issue binding trademark orders under the Trade Marks Act. Orders passed by unauthorized officials were declared void, setting a significant precedent for the administration of trademark opposition proceedings in India.
Read more about Only Officers having Quasi Judicial Authority Can Pass Trademark Orders, says the Calcutta High Court