The Madras High Court affirmed the validity of Malladi Drugs’ patent for chiral beta-amino alcohols, highlighting the invention’s novelty and inventive step. The judgment clarifies key principles on patent revocation and the definition of a “person interested” under Indian patent law.
Read more about Madras High Court Upholds Patent Validity in Embio Limited vs. Malladi Drugs & PharmaceuticalsTag: Patent Validity
Novelty and Inventive Step analysis (Part A) – Ericsson Vs. Lava – Part VIII
This article provides a detailed analysis of the novelty and inventive step of Ericsson’s AMR patents as examined in Ericsson Vs. Lava. The Delhi High Court’s findings illustrate how Indian patent law standards are applied to complex telecommunication inventions.
Read more about Novelty and Inventive Step analysis (Part A) – Ericsson Vs. Lava – Part VIIIImportant Patent Case law – 2021
This article presents a structured analysis of notable patent case law decided by Indian courts in 2021, focusing on interim injunctions and patent validity challenges. The judgments discussed provide valuable insight into key legal principles shaping Indian patent litigation.
Read more about Important Patent Case law – 2021Temporary Injunction: Mariappan Vs. A.R. Safiullah
This post analyses the Mariappan vs AR Safiullah case on temporary injunctions in Indian patent disputes. The court scrutinised inventive step and the requirements for interim relief, ultimately denying the injunction due to lack of prima facie validity.
Read more about Temporary Injunction: Mariappan Vs. A.R. SafiullahTemporary Injunction: J. Mitra Vs. Kesar Medicaments
In J. Mitra Vs. Kesar Medicaments, the Court examined criteria for granting a temporary injunction in a patent infringement suit. The analysis considered patent validity, infringement, and the balance of convenience, ultimately favouring interim relief for the patent holder.
Read more about Temporary Injunction: J. Mitra Vs. Kesar MedicamentsTemporary Injunction: Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works
This post discusses the denial of a temporary injunction in Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, focusing on patent validity and the criteria for interim relief in Indian patent law. The Court’s analysis highlights the importance of a prima facie case and the impact of recent patents facing validity challenges.
Read more about Temporary Injunction: Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works