Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and Royalty Rates (Ericsson vs. Lava) – Part 1

The Delhi High Court’s judgment in Ericsson vs. Lava clarifies major legal standards for standard essential patents, FRAND royalties, and infringement in India. This case note examines the Court’s findings on patent validity, damages, and licensing practices in the telecom sector.

Read more about Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and Royalty Rates (Ericsson vs. Lava) – Part 1

All elements rule versus Doctrine of equivalents, a recent decision by Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court recently addressed the interplay between the all elements rule and the doctrine of equivalents in a patent dispute over brick-making machines. The Court granted interim relief, affirming a nuanced approach to patent claim analysis and infringement in Indian law.

Read more about All elements rule versus Doctrine of equivalents, a recent decision by Delhi High Court

Kudos Pharma v. Natco Pharma: A case on patent claims, coverage, validity and infringement.

The Delhi High Court’s decision in Kudos Pharma v. Natco Pharma reviews crucial aspects of patent law, including credible challenge and the distinction between patent coverage and disclosure. The Court granted an interim injunction to Kudos Pharma, reinforcing core principles of Indian patent jurisprudence.

Read more about Kudos Pharma v. Natco Pharma: A case on patent claims, coverage, validity and infringement.

Officer’s Choice Trademark, Zinking Patent and Baoji Footwear Cases

This post discusses key Delhi and Himachal Pradesh High Court rulings on trademark and patent infringement. It covers injunctions, label similarities, and rectification petition requirements in Indian IP law. The analysis is based on recent judgments and legal principles.

Read more about Officer’s Choice Trademark, Zinking Patent and Baoji Footwear Cases

Why should I perform a Freedom to Operate (FTO) analysis before launching my product?

Conducting a freedom to operate analysis is essential before launching a product to identify potential patent risks. This process helps assess infringement threats and enables informed decisions, promoting legal compliance and risk mitigation.

Read more about Why should I perform a Freedom to Operate (FTO) analysis before launching my product?

CASE BRIEF: FMC Corporation & Ors. vs. Natco Pharma Limited

The Delhi High Court analysed whether Natco Pharma’s process infringed FMC Corporation’s patented method for producing chlorantraniliprole. The court, relying on expert opinions, found key differences in process steps and chemical agents, leading to a decision of non-infringement.

Read more about CASE BRIEF: FMC Corporation & Ors. vs. Natco Pharma Limited

No single leader in 5G tech, finds USPTO; DHC sets up IPR Bench, notifies final rules and more patent news.

This week’s bulletin highlights the absence of a single leader in 5G technology as found by the USPTO and the notification of key IPR rules by the Delhi High Court. It also covers major international patent disputes and recent legal updates relevant to patent enforcement and policy.

Read more about No single leader in 5G tech, finds USPTO; DHC sets up IPR Bench, notifies final rules and more patent news.