IP Enforcement | Intellepedia

Shoes, footwears and deceptive similarity in Trademark law

The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction in favor of New Balance Athletics, Inc., restraining Kiran Shoe Company from infringing its trademarks. The Court awarded ₹7,00,000 in damages and costs, emphasizing that the defendant’s actions were deliberate and aimed at leveraging New Balance’s reputation.

Deciphering Intellectual Property: A Deep Dive into Recent Indian High Court Judgements

Discover key Intellectual Property rulings from Indian High Courts in our latest BananaIP blog. Dive into concise case overviews, including trademark and patent disputes, providing valuable legal insights.

USTR finds Pakistan better than India in IP Protection.

The USTR’s 2016 Special 301 Report places India on the Priority Watch List for its IP protection framework, while commending Pakistan for notable advancements. This assessment has significant implications for India’s IP policy and international standing.

Indian National IP Policy Update

The Indian National IPR Policy is under review, with its draft raising debates on IP enforcement and access to generic medicines. This update provides an analytical overview of the policy’s objectives and the issues under consideration.

The Case of Indian Intellectual Property – Misplaced Perception

This article analyses how Indian intellectual property is perceived internationally, especially by the United States, and assesses India’s progress over the past decade. It highlights the importance of understanding India’s unique legal and policy framework for intellectual property.

USTR SPECIAL 301 REPORT (2015) – on Priority Watch List

The USTR Special 301 Report 2015 places India on the Priority Watch List, citing ongoing monitoring of its IPR enforcement. The report recognises India’s recent initiatives to strengthen its IP regime and anticipates measurable improvements.