interim injunction | Intellepedia

Latest Trademark Cases in 2021 – Part 6

This post reviews three recent Bombay High Court decisions on trademark and copyright infringement from 2021. It highlights key legal findings on interim injunctions, trademark use in media, and brand similarity, offering insights for IP practitioners and businesses.

Latest Patent Cases in 2021 – Part 2

This article summarises pivotal Delhi High Court decisions on patent disputes in 2021, particularly involving pharmaceutical products. The analysis covers interim injunctions and key arguments in Indian patent litigation.

Temporary Injunction: Mariappan Vs. A.R. Safiullah

This post analyses the Mariappan vs AR Safiullah case on temporary injunctions in Indian patent disputes. The court scrutinised inventive step and the requirements for interim relief, ultimately denying the injunction due to lack of prima facie validity.

Temporary Injunction: J. Mitra Vs. Kesar Medicaments

In J. Mitra Vs. Kesar Medicaments, the Court examined criteria for granting a temporary injunction in a patent infringement suit. The analysis considered patent validity, infringement, and the balance of convenience, ultimately favouring interim relief for the patent holder.

Temporary Injunction: Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works

This post discusses the denial of a temporary injunction in Manika Thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, focusing on patent validity and the criteria for interim relief in Indian patent law. The Court’s analysis highlights the importance of a prima facie case and the impact of recent patents facing validity challenges.

Bajaj-TVS Litigation

The Bajaj-TVS litigation explores the complexities of enforcing patent rights in the Indian motorcycle industry. Courts examined the validity and scope of patents, ultimately finding the technologies distinct and lifting the interim injunction. This case provides insight into judicial reasoning in Indian patent disputes.

Are Applicants Allowed to Later Refute Their Own Submissions at TM Prosecution?

The Delhi High Court recently ruled that applicants cannot later refute their own submissions made during trademark prosecution. The judgment underscores the significance of consistent representations, especially concerning generic terms in trademark disputes within the news industry.