The Madras High Court overturned a patent refusal in Signal Pharmaceuticals vs. Deputy Controller of Patents, citing a lack of reasoning in the rejection order. The Court observed that the Patent Office failed to address the applicant’s arguments, disregarded amended claims, and provided no justification for the refusal under Section 2(1)(ja) and Section 3(d) of the Patents Act. The case was remanded for reconsideration, reinforcing the necessity of well-reasoned patent orders.
Read more about Reasoned orders are a necessity in patent refusals, Madras HC reiteratesTag: Indian Patent Act
Blackberry blacks out in case relating to patentability of algorithmic processes
This article analyzes India’s legal stance on the patentability of algorithmic processes under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970. Focusing on the Delhi High Court’s judgment in Blackberry Limited vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, the post explores key arguments, legal precedents, and implications for software patents in India.
Read more about Blackberry blacks out in case relating to patentability of algorithmic processesComputer Programs with Technical Effect such as enhancing speed and efficiency are patentable, reiterates the Delhi High Court
In an appeal decision, the Delhi High Court recently overturned the rejection of two patent applications filed by Ab Initio Technology LLC, concerning data processing...
Read more about Computer Programs with Technical Effect such as enhancing speed and efficiency are patentable, reiterates the Delhi High Court