Skip to content

Intellepedia

IP News Center

  • Home
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyrights
  • Designs
  • Trade Secrets

Tag: European Court of Justice

Patent: Stem Cell Patent Debate Never Dies

Author: Dr. Kalyan Kankanala
August 5, 2019
Intellectual Property, Patents

This post examines the legal and ethical debate over stem cell patents, contrasting recent European developments with the Indian approach. The analysis highlights the lack of statutory restrictions in India and anticipates future judicial scrutiny of embryonic stem cell patents.

READ MORE Read more about Patent: Stem Cell Patent Debate Never Dies

Rubik’s Cube loses EU trademark battle

Author: Intellepedia
November 18, 2016
Intellectual Property, Trademarks

The European Court of Justice has annulled the EU trademark on Rubik’s Cube, stating its shape does not warrant trademark protection. This decision clarifies the boundary between technical solutions and trademarks in European intellectual property law.

READ MORE Read more about Rubik’s Cube loses EU trademark battle

ECJ Stems “Stem Cell” Patents

Author: Intellepedia
October 26, 2011
Intellectual Property, Patents

The ECJ has held that patents involving embryonic stem cells requiring destruction of human embryos are unpatentable in Europe. This post examines the legal and ethical reasoning behind the ruling and its implications for biotechnological innovation and patent law.

READ MORE Read more about ECJ Stems “Stem Cell” Patents

Categories

IP News

Trending Posts

  • Senior Trademark Associate Opening for Professionals with 5+ Years of Trademark Experience
  • AI Inventorship and the DABUS Refusal in India: Patent Opponent’s Submissions in the Patent Office Order
  • No Reasons, No Refusal - and No Absolute Bar Anymore: Bombay HC on Atomic Energy & Nuclear Patent Rejections
  • Inventorship of DABUS in India: Can an AI System Be the True and First Inventor?
  • Patent Rights Protected Despite NBA Approval Delay: Fresh Examination Directed
  • Isha and Sadhguru: Jurisdiction and Defamation in the Age of Online Content
  • 10 Day IP Practice Courses to Build Practice Ready Professionals for an AI Enabled Practice
  • Seeing Red: Calcutta High Court Upholds Exide's Trade Dress Injunction Against Amaron
  • Captcha Blocks, Accessibility Knocks: Will CGPDTM Open the Door?
  • Patent Attorneys: From Strategic Professionals to Ordinary Vendors? The Changing Soul of India’s Patent Ecosystem

Featured Posts

  • Copyright Enforcement, Quick Court Orders, and the Rise of Intimidatory Tactics
  • Design Is Not a Shield: Delhi High Court on Patent Infringement in the Packaging Industry
  • Patent Attorneys: From Strategic Professionals to Ordinary Vendors? The Changing Soul of India’s Patent Ecosystem
  • Breaking Beams, Breaking Records: Delhi High Court Awards ₹152 Crore in Antenna Patent Infringement Suit Against Rosenberger
  • Artificial Intelligence in IP Practice: Managing Psychological Trauma, Stress, and Anxiety in a Changing Landscape
  • Wanted Dead or Alive: Delhi High Court Holds Patent Revocation Survives Expiry and Section 107 Defence
  • Safeguarding Digital Identity in the age of Deepfakes: An analytical study of AI regulation in India with special reference to Personality Rights jurisprudence
  • Gen AI, Copyrights, and Hybrid Licensing in India Why the Assumptions May Not Sustain the Model
  • Comments and Suggestions on Patent Agent Code of Conduct and Patent Rules Draft
  • AI, Copyrights, and Libraries

Random Posts

  • 10 Day IP Practice Courses to Build Practice Ready Professionals for an AI Enabled Practice
  • Why Owning a Logo Doesn't Mean Owning Its Letters - the A TO Z' Trademark Dispute
  • You Can’t Live with Liv 333: When Trademark Similarity Turns Costly
  • Can Non-Use of a Trademark Fuel a Passing Off Claim? Delhi High Court Says No
  • Wanted Dead or Alive: Delhi High Court Holds Patent Revocation Survives Expiry and Section 107 Defence
  • Court Rules GUIs Eligible for Design Registration : No More Blanket Rejections
  • First Owner of Copyright in Film Music: Delhi HC in Saregama v Ilaiyaraja
  • SoEasy™: Not So Easy to Trademark
  • When Authors Sign Away Rights: Producer–Author Copyright Contracts Tested in Bombay High Court
  • Job Opening Junior Trademark Associate for LLM IP Graduates

Convert Documents to Accessible Formats

https://www.robobraille.org/

Visit BananaIP Counsels Website

https://www.bananaip.com

Disclaimer

Intellepedia is an independent knowledge sharing initiative of BananaIP. All content on this website is intended solely for general information and educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney client or advocate client relationship. This website and its content do not amount to advertisement, solicitation or inducement of any kind for legal or professional services. All opinions expressed by individual authors are their own and do not reflect the views or positions of BananaIP or any organisation or firm with which they may be affiliated.

We welcome your questions, suggestions and corrections. If you are interested in contributing as an author, please write to us. Intellectual property experts and professionals from all related fields are welcome to participate.

Contribute to Intellepedia

contact@intellepedia.org

Archives

  • Home
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyrights
  • Designs
  • Trade Secrets

© 2026 Intellepedia. All Rights Reserved.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement