The Delhi High Court refused an interim injunction in a patent dispute over a fuel cap, citing ambiguous claims and prosecution history. The judgment highlights the need for precise claim drafting and careful interpretation in patent litigation.
Read more about Court refuses interim injunction based on Patent Prosecution HistoryTag: Delhi High Court
Cannot drive on ‘VOLVO’ and ‘FMX’ marks’ reputation rules court
The Delhi High Court has upheld the reputation of VOLVO and FMX trademarks, granting an injunction against unauthorised use by Lamina Suspension Products Ltd. The court recognised VOLVO as a well-known mark and enforced a settlement restricting further misuse.
Read more about Cannot drive on ‘VOLVO’ and ‘FMX’ marks’ reputation rules courtA jolly win for ‘JOLLY RANCHER’ against ‘JOKY RAMPER’
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction and damages to JOLLY RANCHER for trademark infringement and passing off by JOKY RAMPER. This decision underscores the importance of protecting trade dress and brand identity in the Indian confectionery market.
Read more about A jolly win for ‘JOLLY RANCHER’ against ‘JOKY RAMPER’Revisiting Novartis versus Natco – Cancer drugs, divisional applications and patent validity
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Novartis’s Ceritinib patent against Natco’s challenge, addressing divisional application issues and allegations of suppression. The injunction against Natco remains in force, reinforcing the enforceability of Novartis’s patent rights.
Read more about Revisiting Novartis versus Natco – Cancer drugs, divisional applications and patent validityDelhi High Court Protects Hindware’s Trademark and Design Rights
The Delhi High Court has issued interim injunctions in favour of Hindware, restraining alleged trademark and design infringement by B.S. Tiles & Ors. The case highlights the court’s approach to safeguarding intellectual property in the sanitaryware sector.
Read more about Delhi High Court Protects Hindware’s Trademark and Design RightsITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks
The Delhi High Court granted ITC an interim injunction restraining Arpita Agro from using the mark POWRNYM, finding it deceptively similar to ITC’s NIMYLE and JOR-POWR trademarks. This case highlights the importance of respecting trademark rights and contractual obligations in the Indian legal context.
Read more about ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR TrademarksCOCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors
The Delhi High Court cancelled a deceptively similar trademark registration for COCOMELON, reinforcing protections for well-known marks. The judgment highlights that substantial similarity and bad faith can lead to trademark cancellation in India.
Read more about COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors“TATA COPPER+ WATER” Trademark Infringement Injuncted with Nominal Damages
The Delhi High Court issued a permanent injunction in favour of Tata Sons against trademark and trade dress infringement involving TATA COPPER+ WATER. The defendant, a first-time infringer, was ordered to pay nominal costs and destroy infringing goods as per the court’s structured approach.
Read more about “TATA COPPER+ WATER” Trademark Infringement Injuncted with Nominal DamagesRummy Culture and Gameskraft Trademarks: Order to Take Down Infringing Online Gaming Websites and Apps
The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction in favour of Gameskraft, restricting infringing online gaming websites from using the RummyCulture and Gameskraft marks. The order addresses trademark and copyright violations, mandating takedown and domain blocking measures.
Read more about Rummy Culture and Gameskraft Trademarks: Order to Take Down Infringing Online Gaming Websites and AppsCourt restores patent application despite missed deadline to file request for examination
The Delhi High Court restored a patent application that was deemed withdrawn after a missed Form 18 deadline caused by agent negligence. The Court held that applicants should not be penalised for their representative’s errors, affirming the applicant’s diligent intent.
Read more about Court restores patent application despite missed deadline to file request for examination