Calcutta High Court | Intellepedia

Deciphering India’s Design Law: A Series on Noteworthy Judgments (Part 2)

This post examines significant Indian judgments on design law, including cases on infringement and registrability. It offers objective analysis to guide legal practitioners and stakeholders.

Deciphering India’s Design Law: A Series on Noteworthy Judgments (Part 1)

This post presents an analytical overview of three recent High Court judgments interpreting design law in India. It highlights the courts’ reasoning on infringement and the standards for design validity, providing clarity for intellectual property stakeholders.

Youtuber Held Liable for Unauthorized Use of Trademarks: Dabur India Limited v. Dhruv Rathee and Ors.

The Calcutta High Court’s ruling in Dabur India Limited v. Dhruv Rathee and Ors. addresses trademark and copyright infringement by a social media influencer. The decision clarifies the legal limits of criticism and the protection of brand rights under Indian law.

Latest Trademark Cases – 2021 | Part 1

This post summarises the latest Indian trademark cases decided in 2021 by key courts. It covers injunctions, infringement claims, and protection of well known marks, offering a clear legal perspective.

Summary of Indian Industrial Design Cases of 2019

This post presents a detailed summary of major Indian industrial design cases from 2019. It addresses key legal principles on design protection, trademark rights, and court interpretations concerning product shapes and novelty.

‘Darjeeling’ is Not Owned by Tea Board

The Calcutta High Court ruled that Geographical Indication registration for Darjeeling Tea does not give the Tea Board exclusive rights over the term Darjeeling in other contexts. This post examines the legal reasoning and its implications for intellectual property rights in India.

Patanjali mired in controversy once again

Emami filed a legal case against Patanjali for alleged infringement of its Kesh King trademark and design. The Calcutta High Court issued an interim restraint before the parties reached a settlement.