Lights out for “Everyday” Lighters : Injunction in favour of EVEREADY

The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction against KSC Industries, restraining them from using the EVERYDAY mark, which was found similar to Eveready’s well-known EVEREADY trademarks. The Court considered visual, structural, and phonetic similarities and recognised the potential for consumer confusion.

Read more about Lights out for “Everyday” Lighters : Injunction in favour of EVEREADY

Transparency Triumphs : Patent Refusals must elucidate clear grounds

The Delhi High Court has reiterated the need for transparency in patent refusal orders, stating that clear grounds must be provided. The judgment highlights the importance of detailed reasoning and independent assessment of each claim in patent applications.

Read more about Transparency Triumphs : Patent Refusals must elucidate clear grounds

Revocation of Patent on the ground of misrepresentation – Ericsson vs Lava : Part VI

The Delhi High Court in Ericsson vs Lava clarified that revocation of a patent on the ground of misrepresentation requires strong, clear evidence of intentional deceit. In this case, Lava failed to meet the legal threshold, resulting in rejection of its revocation claim.

Read more about Revocation of Patent on the ground of misrepresentation – Ericsson vs Lava : Part VI

ITC Protects “Gold Flake” Brand: Court Halts Sale of Deceptively Similar Cigarettes

The Delhi High Court has restrained several parties from selling cigarettes using deceptively similar marks to ITC’s Gold Flake brand, citing clear infringement and passing off. This decision underscores the judicial approach to protecting well-known trademarks in India.

Read more about ITC Protects “Gold Flake” Brand: Court Halts Sale of Deceptively Similar Cigarettes

Section 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2

This post analyses the Delhi High Court’s interpretation of Section 3(k) in Ericsson vs Lava, focusing on the patentability of algorithms and computer programs in India. It clarifies the assessment criteria for such inventions and the legislative intent behind software patentability.

Read more about Section 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2

No monopoly rights over common surnames such as JINDAL, court dismisses injunction petition.

The Delhi High Court dismissed an interim injunction plea, holding that the use of the common surname JINDAL cannot be monopolised under trademark law. The court found no infringement or passing off, as the impugned mark was sufficiently distinct.

Read more about No monopoly rights over common surnames such as JINDAL, court dismisses injunction petition.

Delhi High Court issues injunction against Software Piracy

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining unauthorised use of Bentley Systems’ software, addressing copyright infringement claims. The order underscores the protection of international software copyrights in India and the legal approach to software piracy.

Read more about Delhi High Court issues injunction against Software Piracy