This week’s trademark updates discuss significant court rulings on trademark infringement and shape marks, including the ISKCON dispute and GI product promotions. The bulletin delivers a concise analysis of recent legal developments in Indian and international trademark law.
Read more about Weekly Trademark UpdatesWeekly Anti-Trust and Privacy Updates
This week’s anti-trust and privacy updates review NCLAT’s penalty on Amazon, Apple’s ATT probe in Germany, and legal proceedings on WhatsApp’s privacy policy in India. The bulletin reflects current trends in competition and privacy law.
Read more about Weekly Anti-Trust and Privacy UpdatesCASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court’s decision in Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India addresses key procedural and substantive aspects of post grant patent opposition in India. The judgment clarifies evidentiary requirements, parties’ rights regarding Opposition Board reports, and the strict timelines under the Patents Act and Rules.
Read more about CASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.Delhi High Court asks the Patent Office to decide on amendments and give adequate opportunity in Opposition Proceedings
The Delhi High Court has provided clear procedural guidance for patent opposition proceedings, focusing on transparency and fair opportunity for all parties. The judgment underscores the importance of timely decisions on claim amendments and systematic handling of pre-grant oppositions by the Indian Patent Office.
Read more about Delhi High Court asks the Patent Office to decide on amendments and give adequate opportunity in Opposition ProceedingsPost-Grant Patent Opposition, Evidence and Hearings: Role of Patent Office, Opposition Board, and Parties
This post provides an analytical overview of the procedures and legal standards for post-grant patent opposition in India. It examines the Delhi High Court’s guidance on evidence, hearings, and the respective roles of the Patent Office and Opposition Board, underscoring the need for transparency and timely adjudication.
Read more about Post-Grant Patent Opposition, Evidence and Hearings: Role of Patent Office, Opposition Board, and PartiesWeekly Trademark Updates
This week’s trademark updates discuss key legal rulings and legislative developments in India and the EU. Topics include the Hero trademark dispute, GI Bill amendments, and recent Delhi High Court decisions impacting trademark and domain name law.
Read more about Weekly Trademark UpdatesWeekly Updates: Copyright and Entertainment Law
This weekly bulletin analyses recent copyright and entertainment law updates in India, including court decisions on film releases and regulatory advisories for FM radio. It is compiled by BananaIP Counsels to promote legal awareness in intellectual property.
Read more about Weekly Updates: Copyright and Entertainment LawHigh Court permits delayed trademark evidence because of E-portal upload issues
The Delhi High Court permitted delayed filing of trademark opposition evidence due to e-portal upload limits, clarifying statutory timelines under trademark rules. This case illustrates how technical challenges in e-filing are addressed by the judiciary to ensure procedural fairness in trademark proceedings.
Read more about High Court permits delayed trademark evidence because of E-portal upload issuesWeekly Trademark Updates
This week’s bulletin reviews notable trademark cases from the Delhi High Court, recent infringement suits, and a GI tag application. The analysis reflects key legal trends in Indian trademark and copyright law.
Read more about Weekly Trademark UpdatesCASE BRIEF : European Commission vs. Union of India
This case brief discusses the Delhi High Court’s decision in European Commission vs Union of India regarding the restoration of patent applications deemed abandoned due to procedural lapses. The judgment underscores the importance of judicial discretion in exceptional circumstances under Indian patent law.
Read more about CASE BRIEF : European Commission vs. Union of India