Case Reviews | Intellepedia

Patent Application Rejection Set Aside for Improper Citation of Withdrawn Prior Art

The Madras High Court overturned a patent rejection due to improper citation of withdrawn prior art, directing a fresh examination. The case highlights the necessity for strict compliance with procedural safeguards in Indian patent proceedings.

Refusal of FACT Trademark for Air/Water Purification Products Set Aside

The Madras High Court reversed the refusal of the FACT trademark for air and water purification products, noting clear sectoral distinctions from existing marks. The decision underscores the importance of distinctiveness and product classification in trademark registration.

“TATA COPPER+ WATER” Trademark Infringement Injuncted with Nominal Damages

The Delhi High Court issued a permanent injunction in favour of Tata Sons against trademark and trade dress infringement involving TATA COPPER+ WATER. The defendant, a first-time infringer, was ordered to pay nominal costs and destroy infringing goods as per the court’s structured approach.

Rummy Culture and Gameskraft Trademarks: Order to Take Down Infringing Online Gaming Websites and Apps

The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction in favour of Gameskraft, restricting infringing online gaming websites from using the RummyCulture and Gameskraft marks. The order addresses trademark and copyright violations, mandating takedown and domain blocking measures.

Same Name, Different Game? Sankalp Constructions vs Shankalp Associates

The Sankalp Constructions vs Shankalp Associates judgment addresses trademark infringement and passing off allegations in the real estate industry. The Court dismissed the suit, emphasising the need for evidence of deceptive similarity and actual confusion.

Nike swooshes away trademark infringers, comes out All Stars

The Delhi District Court has awarded Nike a permanent injunction and exemplary damages in a trademark infringement suit involving the misuse of its well-known marks. This case highlights the legal standards for infringement and passing off in India, offering crucial insights for brand protection.

“VARUN” scoops up an icy win against “ARUN”, court affirms co-existence of Trademarks

The Madras High Court upheld the coexistence of ARUN and VARUN trademarks, citing lack of evidence of confusion and acquired distinctiveness. The petition for cancellation of the VARUN mark was dismissed, allowing both marks to remain in use.

Trademark Exhaustion: Resale of lawfully acquired TMT Bars does not amount to Trademark Infringement

The Calcutta High Court clarified that resale of lawfully acquired TMT bars does not infringe trademark rights if the goods are unaltered and obtained from authorized distributors. This case sets important precedent on the application of trademark exhaustion under Indian law.

CIT Trademark: Coimbatore Institute of Technology Prevails over Chennai Institute of Technology

The Madras High Court ruled that Coimbatore Institute of Technology’s prior use entitled it to exclusive rights over the CIT trademark. The court ordered the removal of the respondent’s registration, highlighting the importance of distinctiveness and transparency in trademark disputes.

Court restores patent application despite missed deadline to file request for examination

The Delhi High Court restored a patent application that was deemed withdrawn after a missed Form 18 deadline caused by agent negligence. The Court held that applicants should not be penalised for their representative’s errors, affirming the applicant’s diligent intent.