The Delhi High Court held that a revocation petition under Section 64 of the Patents Act is distinct from an invalidity defence under Section 107 and remains valid post-patent expiry. The Court emphasized the broader legal impact of revocation, affirming its maintainability even when the patent has lapsed.
Read more about Revocation is Distinct from Invalidity Defence and Survives Patent Expiry, rules Delhi High CourtTag: Patent Revocation
Vitiation of IPAB and Beyond – Changes to the Indian Patents Act
The President of India on fourth of April 2021 promulgated “The Tribunals Reforms (Rationalization and Conditions of Service) Ordinance 2021”. This Ordinance abolishes the various...
Read more about Vitiation of IPAB and Beyond – Changes to the Indian Patents ActTribunals Reforms Ordinance 2021 and amendments to the Patents Act, 1970
The President of India on the 4th of April 2021 promulgated the “THE TRIBUNALS REFORMS (RATIONALISATION AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) ORDINANCE, 2021”. With the passing...
Read more about Tribunals Reforms Ordinance 2021 and amendments to the Patents Act, 1970Compulsory Licensing in India – Talk by Gaurav Mishra
Mr. Gaurav Mishra, Managing Associate at BananaIP Counsels delivered a talk on the Compulsory licensing provisions in India under the Patents Act on the 3rd...
Read more about Compulsory Licensing in India – Talk by Gaurav MishraIndian Patent Revocation: K. Manivannan, Vs. Shri M. Mani, Proprietor Valasumani Lathe Works
The Appellate Board dismissed the revocation request against Valasumani Lathe Works’ patent, finding no anticipation from prior art or abandoned applications. This decision clarifies key principles on anticipation and prior art for Indian patent law.
Read more about Indian Patent Revocation: K. Manivannan, Vs. Shri M. Mani, Proprietor Valasumani Lathe WorksLaxmi Dutt Roop Chand Vs. Nankau
This case evaluates a patent infringement dispute concerning hollow ware manufacturing processes in India. The Court compared both parties’ methods, ultimately finding no infringement due to significant procedural differences.
Read more about Laxmi Dutt Roop Chand Vs. NankauIndian Patent Process and Procedure – Presentation by Ms. Vinita Radhakrishnan at UPES School of Law
This presentation titled is part of the 'Patent Law and Practice Program' being taught by BananaIP Team at UPES School of Law to B.tech-LLB Students....
Read more about Indian Patent Process and Procedure – Presentation by Ms. Vinita Radhakrishnan at UPES School of LawIs Statement of Working of Patents For Public Interest?
The post analyses whether the statement of working of patents in India truly advances public interest or remains a procedural formality. It argues that while mandatory, its enforcement does not substantially benefit the public or the innovation ecosystem.
Read more about Is Statement of Working of Patents For Public Interest?Roche loses again
The Indian Patent Office has revoked Roche’s Valganciclovir patent, emphasizing Section 3d and public interest. This decision strengthens access to medicines in India and curbs evergreening by pharmaceutical companies.
Read more about Roche loses againRoche’s backbone rendered brittle by Indian Patent Office
The Indian Patent Office has revoked Roche’s patent on Bonviva after Cipla challenged its validity, citing a lack of inventive step and patentability. This decision highlights critical aspects of Indian pharmaceutical patent law and its impact on international drug companies.
Read more about Roche’s backbone rendered brittle by Indian Patent Office