The Madras High Court has overturned the refusal of Microsoft’s patent application, clarifying the correct approach to assessing inventive step and the PSITA standard under Indian law. The decision highlights the need for a nuanced analysis of prior art and patent claims.
Read more about PSITA is not omniscient, says Madras High Court. Overturns refusal order in favour of Microsoft.Tag: Patent Litigation
Madras High Court Rulings on Patent Application Refusals
Recent Madras High Court rulings have clarified the standards for refusing patent applications in India. The Court emphasized the need for clear, detailed reasoning in refusals, ensuring transparency and fairness in the patent examination process.
Read more about Madras High Court Rulings on Patent Application RefusalsNokia Vs. Oppo: Standard Essential Patents and Deposit during Suit Pendency
The Delhi High Court addressed Nokia’s request for interim royalty deposit from Oppo in a standard essential patents dispute. The judgment clarifies the application of FRAND licensing and the legal standards governing SEP litigation in India.
Read more about Nokia Vs. Oppo: Standard Essential Patents and Deposit during Suit PendencyCASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court’s decision in Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India addresses key procedural and substantive aspects of post grant patent opposition in India. The judgment clarifies evidentiary requirements, parties’ rights regarding Opposition Board reports, and the strict timelines under the Patents Act and Rules.
Read more about CASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.Delhi High Court Rules Governing Patent Suits, 2022
The Delhi High Court Rules Governing Patent Suits, 2022 provide a detailed procedural framework for handling patent litigation. These rules aim to streamline patent prosecution and clarify documentation requirements at every stage of a suit.
Read more about Delhi High Court Rules Governing Patent Suits, 2022Recap 2021- Indian Patent Case Laws
This post analyses major Indian patent case laws from 2021, with a focus on Delhi High Court decisions involving interim injunctions and pharmaceutical patents. It offers an objective summary of key judgments relevant to patent infringement and validity in India.
Read more about Recap 2021- Indian Patent Case LawsLatest Patent Cases in 2021 – Part 3
This article examines recent patent litigation before the Delhi High Court, highlighting cases involving Novartis and Sulphur Mills in 2021. It discusses key judicial findings on patent validity, scope, and interim injunctions in Indian pharmaceutical and agricultural sectors.
Read more about Latest Patent Cases in 2021 – Part 3Latest Patent Cases in 2021 – Part 1
The H. Lundbeck A/S vs Symed Labs Limited case involved a pre-notice settlement of a patent dispute, with the Delhi High Court decreeing the suit on agreed terms. The settlement clarifies the scope of Section 107A use and sets compliance and reporting obligations for the defendant.
Read more about Latest Patent Cases in 2021 – Part 1Indian Patent Cases and Judgments of 2020
A detailed review of major Indian patent cases and judgments from 2020, addressing core issues in patent opposition, litigation, and enforcement. The analysis offers insights into judicial trends and key legal standards shaping Indian patent law.
Read more about Indian Patent Cases and Judgments of 2020Delhi High Court Patent Rules: Comments
This article provides analytical comments on the draft Delhi High Court Patent Rules 2020, focusing on proposed amendments and their legal justification. The discussion addresses critical procedural definitions for patent suits in India.
Read more about Delhi High Court Patent Rules: Comments