99 articles
This article provides a detailed analysis of the novelty and inventive step of Ericsson’s AMR patents as examined in Ericsson Vs. Lava. The Delhi High Court’s findings illustrate…
The Delhi High Court analysed the validity of eight Ericsson patents under Section 3(k), following Lava’s challenge. Except for the first patent, the Court upheld the remaining patents,…
The Delhi High Court in Ericsson vs Lava clarified that revocation of a patent on the ground of misrepresentation requires strong, clear evidence of intentional deceit. In this…
The Madras High Court has overturned the refusal of Microsoft’s patent application, clarifying the correct approach to assessing inventive step and the PSITA standard under Indian law. The…
Recent Madras High Court rulings have clarified the standards for refusing patent applications in India. The Court emphasized the need for clear, detailed reasoning in refusals, ensuring transparency…
The Delhi High Court addressed Nokia’s request for interim royalty deposit from Oppo in a standard essential patents dispute. The judgment clarifies the application of FRAND licensing and…
The Delhi High Court’s decision in Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India addresses key procedural and substantive aspects of post grant patent opposition in India. The judgment…
The Delhi High Court Rules Governing Patent Suits, 2022 provide a detailed procedural framework for handling patent litigation. These rules aim to streamline patent prosecution and clarify documentation…
This post analyses major Indian patent case laws from 2021, with a focus on Delhi High Court decisions involving interim injunctions and pharmaceutical patents. It offers an objective…
This article examines recent patent litigation before the Delhi High Court, highlighting cases involving Novartis and Sulphur Mills in 2021. It discusses key judicial findings on patent validity,…