Is a Method of Massaging Patentable subject matter?

The post analyses whether massage methods can be patented in India, highlighting the distinction between non-medical and medical methods under Section 3(i) of the Patents Act. It references UK practice and suggests the Indian Patent Office may follow similar standards in the absence of direct precedents.

Read more about Is a Method of Massaging Patentable subject matter?

Guidelines for Writing an Abstract from the Indian Patent Office

This post analyses the Indian Patent Office’s abstract guidelines, referencing the Patent Act and Rules. It explains the mandatory components, verification process, and the significance of accurate abstracts in patent searches. The discussion underscores recent procedural changes for enhanced clarity and compliance.

Read more about Guidelines for Writing an Abstract from the Indian Patent Office

Revocation of Patents in India – Lecture by Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala at UPES School of Law

Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala’s lecture at UPES School of Law covered the grounds and process for patent revocation in India, with a structured comparison to pre-grant and post-grant oppositions. The session offered objective insights into Indian patent law, supporting students in understanding critical legal concepts.

Read more about Revocation of Patents in India – Lecture by Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala at UPES School of Law

Patentability and Section 3(d), History of Patent Law in India, Patentability of Imatinib Masylate in Beta Crystalline Form – Novartis Case Abridged by Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala

This abridged Novartis case by Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala explains the patentability requirements under Section 3(d) of Indian patent law. It provides a structured analysis of the legal and practical issues surrounding the Imatinib Mesylate patent application.

Read more about Patentability and Section 3(d), History of Patent Law in India, Patentability of Imatinib Masylate in Beta Crystalline Form – Novartis Case Abridged by Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala

Lightning fast Indian Patent Office, Kim Kardashian patent infringement suit, Motorola v. Hytera, Patent Tip of the Week and more.

The latest weekly update analyses Indian Patent Office performance, major patent filings, and global infringement cases. Insights include statistical trends, notable innovations, and expert tips on expediting patent grants in India.

Read more about Lightning fast Indian Patent Office, Kim Kardashian patent infringement suit, Motorola v. Hytera, Patent Tip of the Week and more.

Can a delay in filing a PCT National Phase application in India be condoned? An interesting case on Rule 138 of The Patent Rules, 2003 (Amendment 2016)

This post discusses a Delhi High Court decision on whether the delay in filing a PCT national phase patent application in India can be condoned under Rule 138. The analysis centres on the judicial interpretation of the Controller’s powers and the consequences of non-compliance by subordinate authorities.

Read more about Can a delay in filing a PCT National Phase application in India be condoned? An interesting case on Rule 138 of The Patent Rules, 2003 (Amendment 2016)

PCT National phase delay condonation, Startups, Cow-dung / Urine Patents, Meditation Patents, Smart Toilet Patents, Latest Patent Judgments, IPO slows down, Apple and Qualcomm settlement, Post dating, Patent Tip of the Week and more

This week’s patent news analyses PCT national phase delay condonation, patent statistics, and notable innovations from Indian startups. The post also reviews significant court rulings and provides expert legal insights on patent post dating.

Read more about PCT National phase delay condonation, Startups, Cow-dung / Urine Patents, Meditation Patents, Smart Toilet Patents, Latest Patent Judgments, IPO slows down, Apple and Qualcomm settlement, Post dating, Patent Tip of the Week and more