The Madras High Court set aside the rejection of Industeel France’s patent application, stressing the need for fair and consistent patent examination. The judgment highlights the importance of protecting inventors’ scientific temper and ensuring time-bound decisions under Indian patent law.
Read more about Patent examination should not kill the scientific temper of an inventorTag: IP LItigation
SEP, Infringment and principles relating to actual costs – Ericsson v. Lava – Part 5
This post discusses the Delhi High Court’s approach to awarding actual costs in the Ericsson v Lava standard essential patent litigation. It outlines the legal principles applied and analyses the Court’s reasoning, focusing on party conduct and litigation strategy in determining cost awards.
Read more about SEP, Infringment and principles relating to actual costs – Ericsson v. Lava – Part 5Trademark opposition timelines are mandatory, and must be complied strictly, says the Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court clarified that trademark opposition timelines are mandatory and not subject to extension by the Registrar. The Court reinstated an opposition abandoned due to a minor delay in service, emphasizing strict statutory compliance.
Read more about Trademark opposition timelines are mandatory, and must be complied strictly, says the Delhi High CourtPatent and Trademark Dispute Settlements
This post examines recent patent and trademark dispute settlements in India, focusing on the legal terms and practical implications. The cases illustrate the advantages of amicable resolution in intellectual property disputes.
Read more about Patent and Trademark Dispute SettlementsTrademark Cases: Kalpaka Trademark Republication, Puro Healthy Salt Disparagement, and Tazza Patta Trademark Infringement
This post examines recent Indian trademark cases on republication, disparagement, and deceptive similarity. It discusses judicial reasoning and clarifies important legal standards in trademark law. Readers are encouraged to consult the full judgments for comprehensive understanding.
Read more about Trademark Cases: Kalpaka Trademark Republication, Puro Healthy Salt Disparagement, and Tazza Patta Trademark InfringementOur Comments on the Draft IPD Rules of Calcutta High Court
BananaIP Counsels shares detailed comments on the Draft IPD Rules of the Calcutta High Court, focusing on accessibility, service timelines, and translation issues. The suggestions aim to improve procedural fairness and inclusivity in intellectual property litigation before the court.
Read more about Our Comments on the Draft IPD Rules of Calcutta High CourtTrademarks In The Courtroom: Noteworthy Decisions From India Part – 3
This post examines recent Delhi High Court judgments on trademark rectification and disputes, focusing on confusion, phonetic similarity, and appellate procedures. The analysis reflects evolving judicial interpretations in Indian trademark law.
Read more about Trademarks In The Courtroom: Noteworthy Decisions From India Part – 3Latest Patent Cases in 2022 – Part 1
This post analyses recent Indian patent cases from 2022, focusing on notable court decisions such as MSN Laboratories v. Novartis Ag. It provides legal insights into patent infringement and injunctions in the pharmaceutical sector.
Read more about Latest Patent Cases in 2022 – Part 1Latest Copyright Cases – 2021 – Part 5
The post reviews notable 2021 copyright cases from the Madras High Court concerning film copyright assignments and infringement. It examines the legal approach to unauthorised telecasts and the judicial remedies granted to copyright owners.
Read more about Latest Copyright Cases – 2021 – Part 5Latest Trademark Cases in 2021 – Part 10
This analysis covers vital 2021 trademark cases from Indian courts, including disputes over franchise agreements and trademark infringement. The post provides a clear understanding of recent legal developments in trademark protection and enforcement in India.
Read more about Latest Trademark Cases in 2021 – Part 10